Comparison Overview

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia

VS

Tecnopuc

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia

Level 3, 271 Spring Street , Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ceda.com.au

CEDA (the Committee for Economic Development of Australia) is an independent, non-profit organisation providing thought leadership and policy perspectives on the economic and social issues affecting Australia. We conduct independent research, convene conversations nationwide and work with our members across government, academia and business, seeking to achieve long-term prosperity for all Australians. CEDA was founded in 1960 by Sir Douglas Copland.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 165
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tecnopuc

Avenida Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90619-900, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
https://tecnopuc.pucrs.br/

For over 20 years, we've been working on being stabilished as a global innovation ecosystem, where talents from everywhere come together to drive businesses, projects, and products capable of make an impacting in the world. Through science and technology, we seek innovative solutions to global challenges, co-creating with a community that shares knowledge, resources, and results. All supported by a cutting-edge structure offered by PUCRS, a world-class university. We are more than 290 organizations and startups, connected to over 150 institutions around the world. Come connect to this network and discover that innovation is possible when collaborating with one of the best global innovation ecosystems, as recognized by the Triple E Awards 2023.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceda---committee-for-economic-development-of-australia.jpeg
CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tecnopuc.jpeg
Tecnopuc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tecnopuc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tecnopuc in 2025.

Incident History — CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tecnopuc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tecnopuc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceda---committee-for-economic-development-of-australia.jpeg
CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tecnopuc.jpeg
Tecnopuc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tecnopuc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tecnopuc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company.

In the current year, Tecnopuc company and CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tecnopuc company nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tecnopuc company nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tecnopuc company nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company nor Tecnopuc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia nor Tecnopuc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tecnopuc company.

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company employs more people globally than Tecnopuc company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia nor Tecnopuc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia nor Tecnopuc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia nor Tecnopuc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia nor Tecnopuc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia nor Tecnopuc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia nor Tecnopuc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References