Comparison Overview

CDP Communications Design Print

VS

ADEAS Printing

CDP Communications Design Print

74-82 Rose Lane, Liverpool, undefined, L18 8EE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cdp.co.uk

Established in 1974, CDP has over 40 years of experience and is a leading UK supplier of all things print. In 2017 we launched our new brand, this bold new look represents a refreshed outlook for CDP and a drive to remain at the very forefront of innovation in design and printing services. While our look has changed, our values of service and quality remain the same. Specialist areas: Direct Mail, Hybrid Mail, Marketing, Marketing and Advertising Literature, Print Management, Financial print, Labels, Logos, Branding, Layout, Graphic Design

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ADEAS Printing

321 S Washington Ave, Wichita, Kansas, 67211, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.AdeasPrinting.com/

At ADEAS Printing, we specialize in Graphic Design Services, Printing, Direct Mail, Custom Apparel and Custom Promo goodies like Lip Balm and Stress Balls. Our innovative Door Hangers are a customer fave because they love our Band-It and Stick features. Located down town in the heart of Wichita, KS we are proud to be family owned & operated since 1999. Many of our print products are able to be ordered through our online shipping cart but we love to help customers through phone and email orders as well. Don't see it on our website? No problem - we offer custom print estimates - just call or email your request and our typical response time is only 1 business day. In a hurry? You're not the only one. Many of our customers love to take advantage of our RUSH PROCESSING options. ADEAS Printing (316)269-2494 Local (866)778-4254 Toll Free [email protected] 321 S Washington Ave Wichita, KS 67202

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cdp-print-management.jpeg
CDP Communications Design Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adeas-printing.jpeg
ADEAS Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CDP Communications Design Print
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ADEAS Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDP Communications Design Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ADEAS Printing in 2025.

Incident History — CDP Communications Design Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDP Communications Design Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ADEAS Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ADEAS Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cdp-print-management.jpeg
CDP Communications Design Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adeas-printing.jpeg
ADEAS Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CDP Communications Design Print company and ADEAS Printing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ADEAS Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CDP Communications Design Print company.

In the current year, ADEAS Printing company and CDP Communications Design Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ADEAS Printing company nor CDP Communications Design Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ADEAS Printing company nor CDP Communications Design Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ADEAS Printing company nor CDP Communications Design Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CDP Communications Design Print company nor ADEAS Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CDP Communications Design Print nor ADEAS Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CDP Communications Design Print company nor ADEAS Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CDP Communications Design Print company employs more people globally than ADEAS Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CDP Communications Design Print nor ADEAS Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CDP Communications Design Print nor ADEAS Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CDP Communications Design Print nor ADEAS Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CDP Communications Design Print nor ADEAS Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CDP Communications Design Print nor ADEAS Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CDP Communications Design Print nor ADEAS Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References