Comparison Overview

CDM Print

VS

Mixed Ink Pty Ltd

CDM Print

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

CDM Print (Corporate Documentation Management Pty Ltd) was founded in July 1995 by Michael Jones after twenty years experience in offset printing with his father's company, AOS Printing (Automated Offset Service Pty Ltd). CDM is now recognised as one of Australia's largest privately-owned Digital Print companies, which includes experienced professionals who have identified technology change and whom share the vision of a new era of print centre productivity emerging from traditional and digital technologies. We provide seamless solutions for today’s corporate requirements by offering knowledge-based experience tailored to your needs. CDM has always endeavoured to supply our clients with the very best in quality, service, price and reliability. Our intention is to position CDM as a premium supplier of printed material in Australia. We intend to take advantage of our special niche in the market and establish ourselves as a market leader in the area of low volume, multi-page electronic printing and on-demand supply of documentation.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mixed Ink Pty Ltd

41 Kurnall Rd, Welshpool, Western Australia, 6106, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Mixed Ink is a Western Australian printing company that specialises in printing large format printing. We print shade cloth and banner mesh for the scaffold and construction industry. Mixed Ink has a large format printer that allows for roll to roll printing of products such as shade cloth, banner mesh, textiles as well as large sheets of rigid media

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CDM Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mixed-ink-pty-ltd.jpeg
Mixed Ink Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CDM Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mixed Ink Pty Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDM Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mixed Ink Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — CDM Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDM Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mixed Ink Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mixed Ink Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CDM Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mixed-ink-pty-ltd.jpeg
Mixed Ink Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CDM Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mixed Ink Pty Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mixed Ink Pty Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CDM Print company.

In the current year, Mixed Ink Pty Ltd company and CDM Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mixed Ink Pty Ltd company nor CDM Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mixed Ink Pty Ltd company nor CDM Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mixed Ink Pty Ltd company nor CDM Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CDM Print company nor Mixed Ink Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CDM Print nor Mixed Ink Pty Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CDM Print company nor Mixed Ink Pty Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CDM Print company employs more people globally than Mixed Ink Pty Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CDM Print nor Mixed Ink Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CDM Print nor Mixed Ink Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CDM Print nor Mixed Ink Pty Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CDM Print nor Mixed Ink Pty Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CDM Print nor Mixed Ink Pty Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CDM Print nor Mixed Ink Pty Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N