Comparison Overview

CDM Print

VS

ETILISA

CDM Print

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cdmprint.com.au

CDM Print (Corporate Documentation Management Pty Ltd) was founded in July 1995 by Michael Jones after twenty years experience in offset printing with his father's company, AOS Printing (Automated Offset Service Pty Ltd). CDM is now recognised as one of Australia's largest privately-owned Digital Print companies, which includes experienced professionals who have identified technology change and whom share the vision of a new era of print centre productivity emerging from traditional and digital technologies. We provide seamless solutions for today’s corporate requirements by offering knowledge-based experience tailored to your needs. CDM has always endeavoured to supply our clients with the very best in quality, service, price and reliability. Our intention is to position CDM as a premium supplier of printed material in Australia. We intend to take advantage of our special niche in the market and establish ourselves as a market leader in the area of low volume, multi-page electronic printing and on-demand supply of documentation.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ETILISA

C. Zapatilleros 8-10, Arnedo, 26580, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://etilisa.com

En 1996 empezó nuestra andadura en el mundo del etiquetaje industrial al crear ETIQUETAS DC, empresa dedicada a la fabricación, impresión y distribución de etiquetas y consumibles para el mercado del calzado principalmente. Aprovechando nuestra experiencia en las etiquetas autoadhesivas, en 2010 creamos ETILISA. Nos lanzamos en este proyecto basado en la impresión digital para pedidos pequeños y medianos con muchos acabados dotando a la etiqueta de un gran valor añadido y apostando muy fuerte por el mercado del vino. Hoy, con unos años de muy buena experiencia profesional estamos situados en Arnedo (La Rioja) en unas nuevas y amplias instalaciones. En ETILISA contamos con un equipo de trabajo joven y muy bien formado, distribuido en distintas áreas de trabajo: Administración, Comercial, Planificación, Atención al cliente de diseño, Preimpresión, Impresión, Acabados y Calidad. Estos departamentos se encargan de fabricar etiquetas de alta calidad (offset digital y offset tradicional), muy competitivas en precio pero sobre todo ofreciendo un servicio inigualable. En 2018 llega a una nueva e importante incorporación técnica, con la gran Miyakoshi Offset Húmedo Semi Rotativa, que nos permite complementar nuestra empresa y poder fabricar pedidos mayores a un precio más competitivo, siguiendo con la mayor calidad del mercado que la da el sistema offset.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CDM Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etilisa.jpeg
ETILISA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CDM Print
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ETILISA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDM Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ETILISA in 2025.

Incident History — CDM Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDM Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ETILISA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ETILISA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CDM Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etilisa.jpeg
ETILISA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CDM Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ETILISA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ETILISA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CDM Print company.

In the current year, ETILISA company and CDM Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ETILISA company nor CDM Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ETILISA company nor CDM Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ETILISA company nor CDM Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CDM Print company nor ETILISA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CDM Print nor ETILISA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CDM Print company nor ETILISA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ETILISA company employs more people globally than CDM Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CDM Print nor ETILISA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CDM Print nor ETILISA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CDM Print nor ETILISA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CDM Print nor ETILISA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CDM Print nor ETILISA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CDM Print nor ETILISA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References