Comparison Overview

CDK Global

VS

Daraz

CDK Global

11809 Domain Drive, Suite 200, Austin, Texas, US, 78758
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 650 and 699

CDK Global is a leading provider of retail technology and software as a service (SaaS) solutions that help dealers and auto manufacturers run their businesses more efficiently, drive improved profitability and create frictionless purchasing and ownership experiences for consumers. Today, CDK serves nearly 15,000 retail locations in North America.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 8,041
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Daraz

8 Shenton Way, Singapore, undefined, undefined, SG
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Daraz is the leading e-commerce marketplace across South Asia (excluding India). Our business covers four key areas – e-commerce, logistics, payment infrastructure and financial services – providing our sellers and customers with an end-to-end commerce solution. With access to over 500 million customers in our markets, we strive to deliver on our promise of enabling easy access to a wide assortment of products while bringing users on an interactive and personalised journey. We are driven by our commitment to uplifting local communities through the power of commerce. We invest in the development and education of our sellers, employees and communities with the goal of empowering them to grow and succeed. As we work towards our vision of becoming a champion of South Asia, we will continue to look for new ways to improve our offerings and connect with our people and communities. Visit https://www.daraz.com/ to learn more.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12,213
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cdknorthamerica.jpeg
CDK Global
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daraz.jpeg
Daraz
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CDK Global
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Daraz
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDK Global in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daraz in 2025.

Incident History — CDK Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDK Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Daraz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daraz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cdknorthamerica.jpeg
CDK Global
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daraz.jpeg
Daraz
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Daraz company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CDK Global company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CDK Global company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Daraz company has not reported any.

In the current year, Daraz company and CDK Global company have not reported any cyber incidents.

CDK Global company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Daraz company has not reported such incidents publicly.

CDK Global company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Daraz company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Daraz company nor CDK Global company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CDK Global company nor Daraz company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CDK Global nor Daraz holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CDK Global company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Daraz company.

Daraz company employs more people globally than CDK Global company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither CDK Global nor Daraz holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CDK Global nor Daraz holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CDK Global nor Daraz holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CDK Global nor Daraz holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CDK Global nor Daraz holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CDK Global nor Daraz holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.