Comparison Overview

CD-Systems

VS

SCN UK Group Ltd

CD-Systems

55, Rue du Pont, Sequedin, Hauts-de-France, 59320, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CD-Systems est à votre service pour faciliter votre vie numérique. Notre clientèle, composée essentiellement de TPE, indépendants et associations nous confie des tâches telles que l'installation de matériels informatiques, assistance aux utilisateurs, sécurisation, accompagnement dans la mise en conformité RGPD, formation aux outils notamment Microsoft 365 & Dolibarr. CD-Systems propose également plus de 20 000 références de matériels informatiques, logiciels, consommables et accessoires.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SCN UK Group Ltd

46 Hall Lane, Walsall, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

SCN is an independent supplier of components and systems in the field of industrial automation. SCN are a leading independent supplier of components and systems for machine builders across Europe and expands into the UK. The UK registered office is located in Walsall, West Midlands but we also have offices in Stockholm, Malmö, Tallinn, Helsinki, Copenhagen, Oslo and Shanghai. Our customer focus is medium-sized and large machine builders. In order to be able to offer our customers the absolute best service and support, we have chosen to form our product range according to our customers needs. Together with a number of different partners who are specialists within their branches, we have built a complete and powerful product range. Sensors, Components, Industrial Computers, Embedded Computers, Control Systems, Drives and Motion

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cd-systems.jpeg
CD-Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diamond-point-international.jpeg
SCN UK Group Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CD-Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SCN UK Group Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CD-Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SCN UK Group Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — CD-Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CD-Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SCN UK Group Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SCN UK Group Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cd-systems.jpeg
CD-Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diamond-point-international.jpeg
SCN UK Group Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CD-Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SCN UK Group Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SCN UK Group Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CD-Systems company.

In the current year, SCN UK Group Ltd company and CD-Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SCN UK Group Ltd company nor CD-Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SCN UK Group Ltd company nor CD-Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SCN UK Group Ltd company nor CD-Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CD-Systems company nor SCN UK Group Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CD-Systems nor SCN UK Group Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CD-Systems company nor SCN UK Group Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SCN UK Group Ltd company employs more people globally than CD-Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither CD-Systems nor SCN UK Group Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor SCN UK Group Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor SCN UK Group Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor SCN UK Group Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor SCN UK Group Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor SCN UK Group Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H