Comparison Overview

CD-Systems

VS

Axiom

CD-Systems

55, Rue du Pont, Sequedin, Hauts-de-France, 59320, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CD-Systems est à votre service pour faciliter votre vie numérique. Notre clientèle, composée essentiellement de TPE, indépendants et associations nous confie des tâches telles que l'installation de matériels informatiques, assistance aux utilisateurs, sécurisation, accompagnement dans la mise en conformité RGPD, formation aux outils notamment Microsoft 365 & Dolibarr. CD-Systems propose également plus de 20 000 références de matériels informatiques, logiciels, consommables et accessoires.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Axiom

undefined, Austin, TX, 78754, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Axiom, The OEM Alternative®, is a leading provider of IT computing memory, storage and networking connectivity upgrade solutions and third-party alternative maintenance. Since 1995, Axiom has been the trusted partner to solution providers, VARs and distributors from coast to coast and throughout North America. With reliability at the cornerstone of its product strategy, Axiom is dedicated to exceeding the industry standard when it comes to detail, quality and consistency. Offering a breadth and diversity of upgrade products in technology, Axiom manufactures and distributes a large line of proprietary and industry standard solutions. Axiom's success is fueled by a corporate-wide passion for high performance and customer satisfaction. Led by an innovative management team, Axiom is committed to the growth, productivity and satisfaction of its most important asset: its employees. The consistent production of quality products and an order fulfillment rate of over 98% showcases dedication and determination of the Axiom family. As the world of information technology continues to evolve, Axiom is poised to continue its aggressive growth and leadership among Fortune 500 corporations, educational institutions and government agencies. Learn more at www.axiomupgrades.com. You can also visit our new AMS site as www.axiomupgrades.com/ams.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cd-systems.jpeg
CD-Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axiom-upgrades.jpeg
Axiom
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CD-Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Axiom
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CD-Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Axiom in 2025.

Incident History — CD-Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CD-Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Axiom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Axiom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cd-systems.jpeg
CD-Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axiom-upgrades.jpeg
Axiom
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CD-Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Axiom company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Axiom company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CD-Systems company.

In the current year, Axiom company and CD-Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Axiom company nor CD-Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Axiom company nor CD-Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Axiom company nor CD-Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CD-Systems company nor Axiom company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CD-Systems nor Axiom holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CD-Systems company nor Axiom company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Axiom company employs more people globally than CD-Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither CD-Systems nor Axiom holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor Axiom holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor Axiom holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor Axiom holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor Axiom holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CD-Systems nor Axiom holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H