Comparison Overview

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

VS

The Oracle Legal Group

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Founded in 1957, we are the oldest and one of the largest full-service intellectual property law firms in China. Our firm has 244 patent attorneys and 78 trademark attorneys, and more than 90 employees with lawyer’s qualification. We provide consultation, prosecution, mediation, administrative enforcement and litigation services for domestic and foreign clients in the fields related to intellectual properties such as patent, trademark, copyright, domain name, trade secret and trade dress. Headquartered in Beijing, we have branch offices in New York, Silicon Valley, Tokyo, Munich, Madrid, Hong Kong, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Shanghai. “CCPIT is broadly acknowledged as a market leader with respect to the prosecution, opposition and enforcement of IP rights. CCPIT offers extensive geographical coverage and versatile industry expertise.” ——Chambers “This firm has a very good reputation. It has a competent team, not just a single competent attorney. The practitioners are proactive." ——MIP “The firm has a sizeable intellectual property practice and offers clients a full-service approach. The firm advises clients on both contentious and non-contentious matters relating to trademarks, patents, domain names and more. The firm has a strong international presence with office locations spread across Asia, USA, and Europe." —— Legal 500

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 258
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Oracle Legal Group

111 W Washington Ave. , Ste 1611, Chicago, IL, US, 60602
Last Update: 2025-11-25

The Oracle Legal Group, LLC provides a comprehensive range of legal services. Because we are a personalized law firm, will work closely with you to determine the best approach to resolve your complex legal issues. Our clients rely on us for our legal expertise and skill, problem-solving abilities, and zealous advocacy. We take our responsibility to handle our clients’ interests seriously while keeping an eye to our clients’ budget. We listen to our clients needs and objectives and find unique and intelligent solutions to their needs. What sets us apart from other firms is our broad range of experience, our creativity, our integrity, and our unflagging efforts to achieve our clients’ objectives. We’d love to hear from you! 💬 Drop a comment and let us know your thoughts about us! Houston https://g.page/r/CVX1QT20qHNlEBM/review Chicago https://g.page/r/CX8T4ez_qXMBEBM/review The Woodlands https://g.page/r/CV0FEgyB_LjUEBM/review

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Oracle Legal Group
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Oracle Legal Group in 2025.

Incident History — CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Oracle Legal Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Oracle Legal Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theoraclelegalgroup.jpeg
The Oracle Legal Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Oracle Legal Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Oracle Legal Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office company.

In the current year, The Oracle Legal Group company and CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Oracle Legal Group company nor CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Oracle Legal Group company nor CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Oracle Legal Group company nor CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office company nor The Oracle Legal Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office nor The Oracle Legal Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office company nor The Oracle Legal Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office company employs more people globally than The Oracle Legal Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office nor The Oracle Legal Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office nor The Oracle Legal Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office nor The Oracle Legal Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office nor The Oracle Legal Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office nor The Oracle Legal Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office nor The Oracle Legal Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X