Comparison Overview

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada

VS

European Commission

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada

undefined, Ottawa, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) ensures Canada's security and prosperity by facilitating and overseeing international travel and trade across Canada's border. Terms of Use: http://ow.ly/g7xq30ldyN6 --- L'Agence des services frontaliers du Canada (ASFC) contribue à la sécurité et à la prospérité des Canadiens en facilitant et en surveillant les déplacements et les échanges commerciaux internationaux à la frontière du Canada. Modalités d'utilisation : http://ow.ly/FUrv30r6n71

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 4,341
Subsidiaries: 60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

European Commission

Rue de la loi, Brussels, BE, 1049
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

The Commission represents and upholds the interests of the EU as a whole, and is independent of national governments. The European Commission prepares legislation for adoption by the Council (representing the member countries) and the Parliament (representing the citizens). It administers the budget and the policy programmes (agriculture, fisheries, research etc.) in cooperation with authorities in the member countries. Visit http://www.europa.eu/ if you want to learn more about the EU, or call the free service number 00 800 6789 10 11 from anywhere in the EU, they speak all 24 official languages. Disclaimer: The European Commission is working to ensure that social networks respect the highest standards of data protection. All users of social networks should be particularly careful about how they disclose their personal information and about how it may be used by third parties and the social network themselves. The presence of the European Commission on LinkedIn does not mean that we endorse or in any way agree with the privacy policy or practices of this professional social media network. Read more about our social media policy → europa.eu/!dyJq74

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 25,686
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbsa-asfc.jpeg
Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/european-commission.jpeg
European Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
European Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for European Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — European Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

European Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbsa-asfc.jpeg
Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unpatched and decommissioned server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/european-commission.jpeg
European Commission
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog

FAQ

European Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to European Commission company.

In the current year, Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company has reported more cyber incidents than European Commission company.

Neither European Commission company nor Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other European Commission company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both European Commission company and Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company nor European Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor European Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to European Commission company.

European Commission company employs more people globally than Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor European Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor European Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor European Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor European Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor European Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor European Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H