Comparison Overview

CBRE

VS

City Developments Limited

CBRE

CBRE Corporate Headquarters: 2100 McKinney Avenue, Dallas, TX, 75201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Operating across every dimension of commercial real estate, CBRE sees more so you can do more.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 68,564
Subsidiaries: 38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

City Developments Limited

9 Raffles Place Singapore, Singapore 048619, SG
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

City Developments Limited (CDL) is a leading global real estate company with a network spanning 163 locations in 29 countries and regions. Listed on the Singapore Exchange, the Group is one of the largest companies by market capitalisation. Its income-stable and geographically-diverse portfolio comprises residences, offices, hotels, serviced apartments, student accommodation, retail malls and integrated developments. With a proven track record of 60 years in real estate development, investment and management, the Group has developed over 50,000 homes and owns around 23 million square feet of gross floor area in residential for lease, commercial and hospitality assets globally. Along with its London-based hotel arm, Millennium & Copthorne Hotels Limited (M&C), the Group has over 155 hotels worldwide, many in key gateway cities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbre.jpeg
CBRE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-developments-limited.jpeg
City Developments Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CBRE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City Developments Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CBRE in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City Developments Limited in 2025.

Incident History — CBRE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CBRE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City Developments Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City Developments Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbre.jpeg
CBRE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-developments-limited.jpeg
City Developments Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CBRE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City Developments Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, City Developments Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CBRE company.

In the current year, City Developments Limited company and CBRE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither City Developments Limited company nor CBRE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither City Developments Limited company nor CBRE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither City Developments Limited company nor CBRE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CBRE company nor City Developments Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CBRE nor City Developments Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CBRE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City Developments Limited company.

CBRE company employs more people globally than City Developments Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither CBRE nor City Developments Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CBRE nor City Developments Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CBRE nor City Developments Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CBRE nor City Developments Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CBRE nor City Developments Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CBRE nor City Developments Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H