Comparison Overview

CBRE

VS

Shimao Group

CBRE

CBRE Corporate Headquarters: 2100 McKinney Avenue, Dallas, 75201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Operating across every dimension of commercial real estate, CBRE sees more so you can do more.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 71,937
Subsidiaries: 38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Shimao Group

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Shimao Group has entered the real estate industry since 1989, After more than 30 years of development, the Group has made its layout in more than 100 core development cities across China, involving real estate, commercial, property management, hotel, theme entertainment and culture. Following the national strategy, Shimao continuously provides customers with high-level quality experience in living, life, consumption, business and tourism, leading the lifestyle and serving a better life.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbre.jpeg
CBRE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/世茂房地产.jpeg
Shimao Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CBRE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shimao Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CBRE in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shimao Group in 2025.

Incident History — CBRE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CBRE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shimao Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shimao Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbre.jpeg
CBRE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/世茂房地产.jpeg
Shimao Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CBRE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shimao Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shimao Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CBRE company.

In the current year, Shimao Group company and CBRE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shimao Group company nor CBRE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shimao Group company nor CBRE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shimao Group company nor CBRE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CBRE company nor Shimao Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CBRE nor Shimao Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CBRE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Shimao Group company.

CBRE company employs more people globally than Shimao Group company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither CBRE nor Shimao Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CBRE nor Shimao Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CBRE nor Shimao Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CBRE nor Shimao Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CBRE nor Shimao Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CBRE nor Shimao Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N