Comparison Overview

City Bar Justice Center

VS

Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA

City Bar Justice Center

42 W 44th St, None, New York, NY, US, 10036
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The City Bar Justice Center (CBJC) increases access to justice by leveraging the resources of the New York City legal community. The CBJC provides legal assistance to those in need; mobilizes lawyers, law firms, corporate legal departments, and other legal institutions to provide pro bono legal services; educates the public on legal issues; fosters strategic relationships; and impacts public policy. Our supporters turn our mission into reality: a dozen core projects led by experts in the field, over 1,000 pro bono attorneys trained and mentored by staff, and the largest free civil legal hotline in New York State all add up to our ability to level the playing field for those without the means to navigate our justice system.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA

3611 Prospect Avenue East, Cleveland, Ohio, 44115, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are the family law attorneys at Zoller|Biacsi Co., LPA. Our law firm is located in Cleveland, Ohio, and serves the entire northeast Ohio area in family law matters, including divorce, child support, spousal support, custody, visitation and others. When our clients come to us, we take time to listen to their concerns and identify a plan that addresses each of their objectives. When questions arise, you receive timely and thorough answers. With us, there are no surprises.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbjc.jpeg
City Bar Justice Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoller-biacsi-co-lpa.jpeg
Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City Bar Justice Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City Bar Justice Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA in 2025.

Incident History — City Bar Justice Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City Bar Justice Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbjc.jpeg
City Bar Justice Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoller-biacsi-co-lpa.jpeg
Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City Bar Justice Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to City Bar Justice Center company.

In the current year, Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA company and City Bar Justice Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA company nor City Bar Justice Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA company nor City Bar Justice Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA company nor City Bar Justice Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City Bar Justice Center company nor Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City Bar Justice Center nor Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither City Bar Justice Center company nor Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

City Bar Justice Center company employs more people globally than Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither City Bar Justice Center nor Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City Bar Justice Center nor Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City Bar Justice Center nor Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City Bar Justice Center nor Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City Bar Justice Center nor Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City Bar Justice Center nor Zoller | Biacsi Co., LPA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X