Comparison Overview

Cayman Law

VS

ABC CONSULTANCY

Cayman Law

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Cayman Law represents businesses and individuals in Cayman from all around the globe. The firm is a high – end boutique practice that has a strong commitment for providing the best strategic solutions and solving our client’s problems. We work with you to provide successful resolutions to your business and individual opportunities and problems. The firm is led by Chris Narborough, who has over 25 years’ experience in the jurisdiction as an attorney and has been involved in many of its highest – profile and successful projects

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ABC CONSULTANCY

Dr. Burhanettin Onat Cad, Antalya, 07100, TR
Last Update: 2025-11-27

ABC CONSULTANCY provides expertise in variety areas in tax, legal, financial and financial issues. The mission is to assist and advise companies fortheir business in cross-border investments. ABC CONSULTANCY headquarter is in Turkey. Also the advantage of the opportunities in Turkey is not forgotten in this way. ABC Consultancy has more than 20 years of knowledge and experience and related legislation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cayman-law.jpeg
Cayman Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abc-consultancy.jpeg
ABC CONSULTANCY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cayman Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABC CONSULTANCY
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cayman Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABC CONSULTANCY in 2025.

Incident History — Cayman Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cayman Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABC CONSULTANCY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABC CONSULTANCY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cayman-law.jpeg
Cayman Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abc-consultancy.jpeg
ABC CONSULTANCY
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ABC CONSULTANCY company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cayman Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ABC CONSULTANCY company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cayman Law company.

In the current year, ABC CONSULTANCY company and Cayman Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ABC CONSULTANCY company nor Cayman Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ABC CONSULTANCY company nor Cayman Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ABC CONSULTANCY company nor Cayman Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cayman Law company nor ABC CONSULTANCY company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cayman Law nor ABC CONSULTANCY holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cayman Law company nor ABC CONSULTANCY company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ABC CONSULTANCY company employs more people globally than Cayman Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cayman Law nor ABC CONSULTANCY holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cayman Law nor ABC CONSULTANCY holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cayman Law nor ABC CONSULTANCY holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cayman Law nor ABC CONSULTANCY holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cayman Law nor ABC CONSULTANCY holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cayman Law nor ABC CONSULTANCY holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X