Comparison Overview

CAVU Securities, LLC

VS

Lincoln Financial

CAVU Securities, LLC

777 3rd Ave, New York, NY, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

CAVU Securities, LLC is an African-American and veteran-owned and operated institutional broker-dealer. Focused on the Fortune 500, CAVU offers a wide range of products and services across cash management, capital markets, and the advisory landscape. CAVUโ€™s focus is to provide our partners with the ability to access best-in-class products and services within the construct of DEI support and participation. As a certified veteran and minority-owned firm, CAVU Securities is committed to creating equitable opportunities through DEI strategies and providing support to community impact organizations serving veterans and underrepresented groups. As a part of CAVU's social impact objectives, we commit financial support to our nonprofit partners via our Impact Pledge- which is 10% of gross revenue on capital market deal fees and the CAVU money market fund share classes. We are working together to make a difference.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lincoln Financial

150 N. Radnor-Chester Road, Radnor, PA, 19087, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)

Strong

Lincoln Financial (NYSE: LNC) helps people to confidently plan for their version of a successful future. We focus on identifying a clear path toย financial security, with products including annuities, life insurance, group protection, and retirement plan services. ย  With our 120-year track record of expertise and integrity, millions of customers trust our solutions and service to help put their goals in reach.ย  ย Ready to take action? Visit LincolnFinancial.com. ย  Lincoln Financial Distributors, a broker-dealer, is the wholesale distribution organization of Lincoln Financial. Lincoln Financial is the marketing name for Lincoln National Corporation and its affiliates including The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Fort Wayne, IN, and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York, Syracuse, NY. Lincoln Financialโ„  affiliates, their distributors, and their respective employees, representatives and/or insurance agents do not provide tax, accounting or legal advice.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,646
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cavu-securities-llc.jpeg
CAVU Securities, LLC
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincoln-financial.jpeg
Lincoln Financial
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
CAVU Securities, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lincoln Financial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CAVU Securities, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincoln Financial in 2025.

Incident History โ€” CAVU Securities, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CAVU Securities, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Lincoln Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cavu-securities-llc.jpeg
CAVU Securities, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincoln-financial.jpeg
Lincoln Financial
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CAVU Securities, LLC company and Lincoln Financial company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lincoln Financial company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CAVU Securities, LLC company.

In the current year, Lincoln Financial company and CAVU Securities, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lincoln Financial company nor CAVU Securities, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lincoln Financial company nor CAVU Securities, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lincoln Financial company nor CAVU Securities, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CAVU Securities, LLC company nor Lincoln Financial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CAVU Securities, LLC company nor Lincoln Financial company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lincoln Financial company employs more people globally than CAVU Securities, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.