Comparison Overview

Cathay Pacific

VS

Delta Air Lines

Cathay Pacific

Cathay City, Chek Lap Kok, undefined, undefined, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cathaypacific.com

Welcome to the official Cathay Pacific LinkedIn page. We have over 200 destinations in our global network, but want to do more than just move you from A to B. We want to take you further in your journey, and ultimately, to move beyond. And we’re here to do what we can to help you discover what’s next. For flight and other inquiries, please contact us via WhatsApp (+852 2747 2747) and Facebook.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 13,834
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Delta Air Lines

1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30320-6001
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.delta.com

Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) is the U.S. global airline leader in safety, innovation, reliability and customer experience. Powered by our employees around the world, Delta has for a decade led the airline industry in operational excellence while maintaining our reputation for award-winning customer service. With our mission of connecting the people and cultures of the globe, Delta strives to foster understanding across a diverse world and serve as a force for social good.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 77,842
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cathay-pacific-airways.jpeg
Cathay Pacific
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-air-lines.jpeg
Delta Air Lines
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cathay Pacific
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Delta Air Lines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cathay Pacific in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Delta Air Lines has 61.29% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Cathay Pacific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cathay Pacific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Delta Air Lines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delta Air Lines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cathay-pacific-airways.jpeg
Cathay Pacific
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-air-lines.jpeg
Delta Air Lines
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Cathay Pacific company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Delta Air Lines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Delta Air Lines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cathay Pacific company has not reported any.

In the current year, Delta Air Lines company has reported more cyber incidents than Cathay Pacific company.

Neither Delta Air Lines company nor Cathay Pacific company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Delta Air Lines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Cathay Pacific company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Delta Air Lines company nor Cathay Pacific company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cathay Pacific company nor Delta Air Lines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cathay Pacific nor Delta Air Lines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cathay Pacific company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Delta Air Lines company.

Delta Air Lines company employs more people globally than Cathay Pacific company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Cathay Pacific nor Delta Air Lines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cathay Pacific nor Delta Air Lines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cathay Pacific nor Delta Air Lines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cathay Pacific nor Delta Air Lines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cathay Pacific nor Delta Air Lines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cathay Pacific nor Delta Air Lines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References