Comparison Overview

Caterpillar Inc.

VS

Rourkela steel plant

Caterpillar Inc.

Irving, Texas, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

For 100 years, we’ve been helping customers build a better, more sustainable world. Our innovative products and services, backed by our global dealer network, provide exceptional value that helps customers succeed. With 2024 sales and revenues of $64.8 billion, Caterpillar Inc. is the world’s leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, off-highway diesel and natural gas engines, industrial gas turbines and diesel-electric locomotives. Caterpillar does business on every continent, principally operating through three primary segments – Construction Industries, Resource Industries and Energy & Transportation – and provides financing and related services through our Financial Products segment.

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition: Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 58,733
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rourkela steel plant

Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

There is a little bit of steel in Everybody's life Show more Show less

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caterpillar-inc.jpeg
Caterpillar Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rourkela-steel-plant.jpeg
Rourkela steel plant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Caterpillar Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rourkela steel plant
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caterpillar Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rourkela steel plant in 2025.

Incident History — Caterpillar Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caterpillar Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rourkela steel plant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rourkela steel plant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caterpillar-inc.jpeg
Caterpillar Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rourkela-steel-plant.jpeg
Rourkela steel plant
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Caterpillar Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rourkela steel plant company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rourkela steel plant company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Caterpillar Inc. company.

In the current year, Rourkela steel plant company and Caterpillar Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rourkela steel plant company nor Caterpillar Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rourkela steel plant company nor Caterpillar Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rourkela steel plant company nor Caterpillar Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Caterpillar Inc. company nor Rourkela steel plant company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Caterpillar Inc. nor Rourkela steel plant holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Caterpillar Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rourkela steel plant company.

Caterpillar Inc. company employs more people globally than Rourkela steel plant company, reflecting its scale as a Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Caterpillar Inc. nor Rourkela steel plant holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Caterpillar Inc. nor Rourkela steel plant holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Caterpillar Inc. nor Rourkela steel plant holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Caterpillar Inc. nor Rourkela steel plant holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Caterpillar Inc. nor Rourkela steel plant holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Caterpillar Inc. nor Rourkela steel plant holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H