Comparison Overview

Category 5 Imaging

VS

Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company

Category 5 Imaging

1062 Cooke Blvd, Burlington, Ontario, L7T 4A8, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.category5.ca

Category 5 Imaging is Canada's leading full service large format printer. No job is too big, nor too complex. This is what we are built for! Proudly representing some of the most iconic brands across North America, we produce all types of large format print materials including billboards, banners, murals, posters, vehicle wraps, and more. We create majestic, awe-inspiring solutions for a variety of industries, whether it be for outdoor, indoor or specialty applications. Category 5 is not just a Printer. Doing large format print well is more than printing – it requires partnering with clients from concept to install; coordinating the entire process and executing with precision. We are very proud of our growing team and the growing list of partners we service. We look forward to the opportunity to get to know you better too!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company

200 Lucius Gordon Drive, West Henrietta, NY, 14586, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hammerpackaging.com

Hammer Packaging is a nationally-ranked package printer specializing in the latest packaging technology, including shrink sleeve, pressure sensitive, cut & stack, flexible packaging and stand up pouches, roll-fed, foam, seed packets, and roll-on/shrink-on labels. Our printing technology includes flexographic, offset, web offset, and digital, each offering endless options for customizing your package. With a dedicated customer service team and expert technicians, we provide the highest value for our customers. In March, 2021, Hammer Packaging was acquired by Fort Dearborn Company and became "Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company."

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 161
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/category-5-imaging.jpeg
Category 5 Imaging
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hammer-packaging.jpeg
Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Category 5 Imaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Category 5 Imaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company in 2025.

Incident History — Category 5 Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Category 5 Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/category-5-imaging.jpeg
Category 5 Imaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hammer-packaging.jpeg
Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Category 5 Imaging company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Category 5 Imaging company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company company and Category 5 Imaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company company nor Category 5 Imaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Category 5 Imaging company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company company nor Category 5 Imaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Category 5 Imaging company nor Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Category 5 Imaging nor Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Category 5 Imaging company.

Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company company employs more people globally than Category 5 Imaging company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Category 5 Imaging nor Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Category 5 Imaging nor Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Category 5 Imaging nor Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Category 5 Imaging nor Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Category 5 Imaging nor Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Category 5 Imaging nor Hammer Packaging, A Fort Dearborn Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References