Comparison Overview

Catawba Science Center

VS

MOCA Jacksonville

Catawba Science Center

243 3rd Ave NE, Hickory, North Carolina, 28601, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://CatawbaScience.org

Catawba Science Center is a nonprofit science and technology museum serving NC’s western Piedmont region. Special attractions include traveling exhibits, a digital planetarium theater and a marine touch pool with live sharks and stingrays. A community asset and regional destination, Catawba Science Center is dedicated to changing lives and inspiring learning through science and wonder. Learn more at www.CatawbaScience.org. CSC is funded in part by the United Arts Fund of Catawba County and the NC Grassroots Science Museums Collaborative. CSC is located in the Arts and Science Center of Catawba Valley, on the SALT Block, 243 3rd Avenue NE, Hickory. CSC offers numerous youth and adult science programs thanks to the generosity of several individuals, companies and organizations. If you are interested in helping CSC, “Change lives and inspire learning through science and wonder”, please call CSC at 828/322-8169 or visit CatawbaScience.org for more information about membership, sponsorship, volunteering and donation opportunities.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MOCA Jacksonville

333 N. Laura St., Jacksonville, 32202, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://mocajacksonville.unf.edu/

The Museum of Contemporary Art Jacksonville promotes the discovery, knowledge, and advancement of the art, artists, and ideas of our time. MOCA Jacksonville, a private nonprofit visual arts educational institution and cultural institute of the University of North Florida, serves the community and its visitors through exhibitions, collections, educational programs, and publications designed to enhance an understanding and appreciation of modern and contemporary art with particular emphasis on works created from 1960 to the present.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catawba-science-center.jpeg
Catawba Science Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mocajax.jpeg
MOCA Jacksonville
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Catawba Science Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MOCA Jacksonville
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Catawba Science Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MOCA Jacksonville in 2026.

Incident History — Catawba Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Catawba Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MOCA Jacksonville (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MOCA Jacksonville cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catawba-science-center.jpeg
Catawba Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mocajax.jpeg
MOCA Jacksonville
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Catawba Science Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MOCA Jacksonville company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MOCA Jacksonville company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Catawba Science Center company.

In the current year, MOCA Jacksonville company and Catawba Science Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville company nor Catawba Science Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville company nor Catawba Science Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville company nor Catawba Science Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Catawba Science Center company nor MOCA Jacksonville company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Catawba Science Center nor MOCA Jacksonville holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Catawba Science Center company nor MOCA Jacksonville company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Catawba Science Center company employs more people globally than MOCA Jacksonville company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Catawba Science Center nor MOCA Jacksonville holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Catawba Science Center nor MOCA Jacksonville holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Catawba Science Center nor MOCA Jacksonville holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Catawba Science Center nor MOCA Jacksonville holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Catawba Science Center nor MOCA Jacksonville holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Catawba Science Center nor MOCA Jacksonville holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References