Comparison Overview

Catalina Museum for Art & History

VS

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts

Catalina Museum for Art & History

217 Metropole Ave, Avalon, California, 90704, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19

Founded in 1953, the Catalina Museum for Art & History (CatalinaMuseum.org) is located in the quaint city of Avalon on beautiful Catalina Island. Just 23 miles from the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area, the Catalina Museum is dedicated to collecting, preserving and sharing the remarkable cultural and historical heritage of Catalina as well as enriching the experiences of residents and visitors through an offering of unique and compelling rotating exhibitions, musical concerts, and other educational programs. It is important to note that the Catalina Museum serves two primary markets – the City of Avalon (pop. 3,600) and the greater Los Angeles area (pop. 3.93 million). If including Orange and San Diego Counties (CA), another 6.4 million can be added to that figure. The Catalina Museum opened a new 18,000 square-foot building in Avalon in 2016. The new building allows it to better serve its mission statement through expanded programs and offerings to enhance all facets of the museum. The Catalina Museum is now able to address the increased demand by both locals and visitors for creative and thought-provoking exhibitions and programming. The new building has become an exciting venue for corporate events, wedding parties and other celebrations. It also boasts upgraded facilities, office space, and an expansion of its popular Museum Store. An exciting schedule of exhibitions is on the books to continue a string of gallery successes in recent years. The primary challenges ahead are to increase the museum's prominence within the local community and visitor community, continue the creative sourcing of new exhibitions, maximize the usage of these new facilities, raise sponsorships and major gifts, and operate the museum as a sustainable nonprofit.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts

Little Rock, US
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799

The Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts is home to a renowned art collection, an expansive Art School, and exceptional performing arts experiences. Serving the state of Arkansas and beyond, AMFA is committed to providing enriching cultural experiences for all. Founded in 1960, its mission is to ensure that learning, inspiration and creative expression in the arts flourish throughout Arkansas, for people of all ages and backgrounds.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalina-island-museum.jpeg
Catalina Museum for Art & History
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-museum-of-fine-arts.jpeg
Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Catalina Museum for Art & History
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Catalina Museum for Art & History in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts in 2026.

Incident History — Catalina Museum for Art & History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Catalina Museum for Art & History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalina-island-museum.jpeg
Catalina Museum for Art & History
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-museum-of-fine-arts.jpeg
Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Catalina Museum for Art & History company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Catalina Museum for Art & History company.

In the current year, Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company and Catalina Museum for Art & History company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company nor Catalina Museum for Art & History company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company nor Catalina Museum for Art & History company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company nor Catalina Museum for Art & History company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Catalina Museum for Art & History company nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Catalina Museum for Art & History nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Catalina Museum for Art & History company nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company employs more people globally than Catalina Museum for Art & History company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Catalina Museum for Art & History nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Catalina Museum for Art & History nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Catalina Museum for Art & History nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Catalina Museum for Art & History nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Catalina Museum for Art & History nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Catalina Museum for Art & History nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N