Comparison Overview

Casinos Austria International

VS

NetBet

Casinos Austria International

Rennweg 44, Vienna, 1038, AT
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Casinos Austria International (CAI) is a leading player in the global casino gaming industry. With our unique portfolio of casino development and management services, we have successfully realized more casino and gaming projects in more jurisdictions than any other operator worldwide. Service, quality, integrity, responsibility and respect for tradition are the driving forces behind our success and are reflected in all our business activities. The Casinos Austria International brand is recognized the world over for its innovative casino gaming concepts. Our casinos combine top class gaming with a range of leisure options. Each of our casinos is specifically designed to meet the needs, tastes and traditions of its host community and makes a valuable contribution to tourism in the region. Together with our local partners, we currently run 12 gaming and entertainment operations in 8 countries around the globe.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NetBet

Ewropa Business Centre, Birkirkara, BKR9034, MT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Since 2006, NetBet has delivered the ultimate online casino and sportsbook experience for its players across the globe. Alongside sports betting and casino, players have also enjoyed Lotto, Live Casino, and Poker products. With access to multiple languages across all its registered markets, thousands of industry-leading casino games, and daily sports events, NetBet has evolved into one of the world’s favourite online gaming brands. NetBet provides users with a friendly environment, total security, and reliable navigation. Its features are recognised by flagship organisations specialising in regulating and controlling online gaming sites. To enrich player trust and protection NetBet has several gaming licences from across the world including MGA, UK, Mexico, Denmark, Greece, France, Romania, and Italy. This ensures that NetBet operates in line with the rules and regulations of each jurisdiction and that players receive the best possible service. Should you need any help or advice about betting, our customer support services are available to answer your questions via email, chat, and phone.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casinos-austria-international.jpeg
Casinos Austria International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netbet.jpeg
NetBet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Casinos Austria International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NetBet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Casinos Austria International in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NetBet in 2025.

Incident History — Casinos Austria International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Casinos Austria International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NetBet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NetBet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casinos-austria-international.jpeg
Casinos Austria International
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netbet.jpeg
NetBet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Casinos Austria International company and NetBet company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, NetBet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Casinos Austria International company.

In the current year, NetBet company and Casinos Austria International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NetBet company nor Casinos Austria International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NetBet company nor Casinos Austria International company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NetBet company nor Casinos Austria International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Casinos Austria International company nor NetBet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Casinos Austria International nor NetBet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Casinos Austria International company nor NetBet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Casinos Austria International company employs more people globally than NetBet company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Casinos Austria International nor NetBet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Casinos Austria International nor NetBet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Casinos Austria International nor NetBet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Casinos Austria International nor NetBet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Casinos Austria International nor NetBet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Casinos Austria International nor NetBet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H