Comparison Overview

Cascadia Labs

VS

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Cascadia Labs

7405 SW Tech Center Drive, Tigard, Oregon, 97223, US
Last Update: 2026-02-15
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.cascadia-labs.com/

Cascadia Labs is a cannabis-centric testing lab. We offer industry-leading analytical services to meet regulatory and research requirements in legal cannabis markets. Contact us today to set up a visit to one of our sites in Oregon or California, and learn more about how we can support your success.

NAICS: 541714
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Thermo Fisher Scientific

168 Third Avenue, Waltham, MA, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
https://www.thermofisher.com

About Thermo Fisher Scientific Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. is the world leader in serving science, with annual revenue of approximately $40 billion. Our Mission is to enable our customers to make the world healthier, cleaner and safer. Whether our customers are accelerating life sciences research, solving complex analytical challenges, increasing productivity in their laboratories, improving patient health through diagnostics or the development and manufacture of life-changing therapies, we are here to support them. Our global team delivers an unrivaled combination of innovative technologies, purchasing convenience and pharmaceutical services through our industry-leading brands, including Thermo Scientific, Applied Biosystems, Invitrogen, Fisher Scientific, Unity Lab Services, Patheon and PPD. For more information, please visit www.thermofisher.com.

NAICS: 541714
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees: 99,125
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascadialabs.jpeg
Cascadia Labs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thermo-fisher-scientific.jpeg
Thermo Fisher Scientific
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cascadia Labs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thermo Fisher Scientific
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cascadia Labs in 2026.

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thermo Fisher Scientific in 2026.

Incident History — Cascadia Labs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cascadia Labs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thermo Fisher Scientific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thermo Fisher Scientific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascadialabs.jpeg
Cascadia Labs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thermo-fisher-scientific.jpeg
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Thermo Fisher Scientific company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cascadia Labs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Thermo Fisher Scientific company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cascadia Labs company has not reported any.

In the current year, Thermo Fisher Scientific company and Cascadia Labs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thermo Fisher Scientific company nor Cascadia Labs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Thermo Fisher Scientific company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Cascadia Labs company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Thermo Fisher Scientific company nor Cascadia Labs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cascadia Labs company nor Thermo Fisher Scientific company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cascadia Labs nor Thermo Fisher Scientific holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Thermo Fisher Scientific company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cascadia Labs company.

Thermo Fisher Scientific company employs more people globally than Cascadia Labs company, reflecting its scale as a Biotechnology Research.

Neither Cascadia Labs nor Thermo Fisher Scientific holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cascadia Labs nor Thermo Fisher Scientific holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cascadia Labs nor Thermo Fisher Scientific holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cascadia Labs nor Thermo Fisher Scientific holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cascadia Labs nor Thermo Fisher Scientific holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cascadia Labs nor Thermo Fisher Scientific holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References