Comparison Overview

Cascadia Health

VS

Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders

Cascadia Health

847 NE 19th Ave., Suite 100, Portland, Oregon, 97207, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Cascadia looks at the whole person and believes that an integrated healthcare approach is the best way to serve our clients.​ Cascadia’s whole health care model empowers individuals as they work toward their goals to achieve recovery. From prevention to healthy lifestyle education to intensive treatment when needed, our services encompass a more systemic approach to health management for the adults, children, seniors, and families we serve. Clients can get primary care and behavioral health care needs through one team, at one location. By integrating services — mental health and addiction treatment, primary care, and housing — we can improve healthcare delivery to those who have chronic mental health challenges and help people live longer and healthier lives. Our Vision: We envision a community where everyone benefits from whole health care, experiences well-being, and has a self-directed, connected life. For more than 35 years, Cascadia has been the community health and housing safety net provider for Oregonians of all ages experiencing mental health and addiction challenges, trauma, poverty, and homelessness. Mission: Cascadia delivers whole health care – integrated mental health and addiction services, primary care, and housing – to promote hope and support the well-being of the communities we serve.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 816
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders

25550 Chagrin Blvd., Suite 200, Beachwood, 44122, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders is an outpatient treatment center that provides clinically proven treatment for children, teens and adults suffering from an eating disorder. Our treatment focuses on both the illness and the individual using behavioral therapies, such as Dialectical and Cognitive behavioral therapies, Maudsley Family Based Therapy, psychiatric treatment and nutritional support. Mark Warren, M.D., and Lucene Wisniewski, Ph.D. — both nationally known lecturers and experts on eating disorders — lead our center, along with a dedicated staff of nurse practitioners, dietitians, psychologists, social workers and counselors. We take a team approach to treat the physical, behavioral, emotional and cognitive aspects of the illness so that suffering can be resolved. As an independent provider, we partner with the region’s health-care systems to spread access to high-quality care to all individuals suffering from an eating disorder across Northeast Ohio. We work with any treatment system and treatment team, providing evidence-based care to referring physicians, therapists, dietitians and other medical professionals. In addition, we’re contracted with the majority of insurance providers to offer an accessible, affordable treatment option for all of our patients.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascadia-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Cascadia Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleveland-center-for-eating-disorders.jpeg
Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cascadia Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cascadia Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders in 2026.

Incident History — Cascadia Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cascadia Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascadia-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Cascadia Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleveland-center-for-eating-disorders.jpeg
Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cascadia Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cascadia Health company.

In the current year, Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders company and Cascadia Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders company nor Cascadia Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders company nor Cascadia Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders company nor Cascadia Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cascadia Health company nor Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cascadia Health nor Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cascadia Health company nor Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cascadia Health company employs more people globally than Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Cascadia Health nor Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cascadia Health nor Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cascadia Health nor Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cascadia Health nor Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cascadia Health nor Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cascadia Health nor Cleveland Center for Eating Disorders holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N