Comparison Overview

Canopy Wellbeing

VS

Deep Roots Wellness

Canopy Wellbeing

7180 SW Fir Loop, Portland, Oregon, 97223, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

Canopy's mission is to support organizational success and improve quality of lives. We provide comprehensive and leading edge services nationwide, such as: • Employee Assistance Programs (#EAP) • Emotional Wellbeing Solutions (#emotionalwellbeingsolutions) • Work/Life Balance Programs (#worklifebalance) • Wellbeing Programs and Coaching (#Wellness, #wellbeing) • Digital Therapy Tools (#WholeLIfeDirections) • Organizational Training and Development (#organizationaldevelopment) • Student Assistance Programs (#SAP) • Executive Coaching (#executivecoaching) We serve organizations nationwide, provide evidence based outcomes, and use advanced technology and innovations. Despite being a large nation provider, our service model remains high-touch and customizable.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Deep Roots Wellness

950 Webster St, Defiance, Ohio, 43512, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

A holistic approach to mental health. We offer a range of services: - Classes and workshops on Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT tapping) CEU courses coming soon! - Emotional Freedom Techniques Coaching via Skype or Facetime. - In-Person Behavioral health assessments and counseling services. We have seen it all, and are comfortable working with a wide range of issues, ages, genders, backgrounds, and orientations. We have extensive experience with domestic violence victims and offenders, veterans, addiction, anxiety and depression, and play-based therapy with children.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascade-centers-inc-.jpeg
Canopy Wellbeing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deep-roots-wellness.jpeg
Deep Roots Wellness
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canopy Wellbeing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Deep Roots Wellness
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canopy Wellbeing in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deep Roots Wellness in 2026.

Incident History — Canopy Wellbeing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canopy Wellbeing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Deep Roots Wellness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deep Roots Wellness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascade-centers-inc-.jpeg
Canopy Wellbeing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deep-roots-wellness.jpeg
Deep Roots Wellness
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Deep Roots Wellness company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canopy Wellbeing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Deep Roots Wellness company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Canopy Wellbeing company.

In the current year, Deep Roots Wellness company and Canopy Wellbeing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Deep Roots Wellness company nor Canopy Wellbeing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Deep Roots Wellness company nor Canopy Wellbeing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Deep Roots Wellness company nor Canopy Wellbeing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Canopy Wellbeing company nor Deep Roots Wellness company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Canopy Wellbeing nor Deep Roots Wellness holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Canopy Wellbeing company nor Deep Roots Wellness company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Canopy Wellbeing company employs more people globally than Deep Roots Wellness company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Canopy Wellbeing nor Deep Roots Wellness holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canopy Wellbeing nor Deep Roots Wellness holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canopy Wellbeing nor Deep Roots Wellness holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canopy Wellbeing nor Deep Roots Wellness holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canopy Wellbeing nor Deep Roots Wellness holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canopy Wellbeing nor Deep Roots Wellness holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N