Comparison Overview

Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston)

VS

Valeo Behavioral Health Care

Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston)

302 Eustis Street, Roxbury, MA, 02119, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Casa Esperanza, Inc. is a bilingual and bi-cultural human services organization that specializes in serving the Latino community in Massachusetts. Our mission is to empower individuals and families to recover from substance use disorder, trauma, mental illness, and other chronic medical conditions; overcome homelessness; and achieve health and wellness through comprehensive, integrated care. Our services: Residential Recovery: Casa Esperanza's Men’s Program serves 29 adult men and Latinas y Niños serves 20 adult women and can also house up to 12 of children age ten or younger so clients in recovery may maintain or regain custody while still in treatment. Residential services usually last six to twelve months and offer evidence-based treatment methodologies as well as assisting clients with setting long-term goals for maintaining their recovery as they transition to independent living. Structured Outpatient Addictions Program (SOAP): Familias Unidas Outpatient Services is a licensed, CARF-accredited clinic that provides client-centered, integrated services to support the complex, long-term needs of people with co-occurring disorders. Familias is co-located with primary care services and is the only Spanish-language SOAP in Greater Boston. Supportive Housing: Nueva Vida provides15 single-occupancy units, Dunmore Place & 300 Eustis Street provides eight family units, and Nueva Esperanza provides 14 individual studio units for a total of 37 units of permanent safe, sober housing for individuals and families, with on-site support for maintaining recovery and building independent living skills. Clinical Stabilization: Conexiones is a structured 24-hour inpatient clinical stabilization program for individuals early in their recovery which includes nursing care, individual and group therapy, psycho-educational groups, case management, health education, and aftercare planning. Our job openings: https://www.casaesperanza.org/who-we-are/our-team/join-our-team/

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Valeo Behavioral Health Care

330 SW Oakley, Topeka, KS, 66606, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Valeo Behavioral Health Care is a 501 (c)(3) nonprofit organization serving Topeka and Shawnee County since 1967 and is the designated mental health authority for Shawnee County. In 2001, we changed our name from Shawnee Community Mental Health Center to Valeo Behavioral Health Care. Valeo is Latin meaning “to be well”. Valeo was originally established as a result of the Community Mental Health Center Act in the 1960’s for the purpose of securing mental health grants. Today, we offer 24-Hour crisis services, and provide mental health, primary care, substance abuse, and problem gambling addictions treatment services for adults. We provide community outreach to partnering agencies, area hospitals, the Shawnee County Jail, law enforcement, and individuals in their homes. We are nationally accredited by the Commission on the Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. Valeo Behavioral Health Care serves over 7,000 people each year. We are involved in evidence-based practice research, providing valuable outcomes information to the University Of Kansas School Of Social Welfare, which is working to develop best practice treatment models for mental health recovery. Valeo employees share a recovery philosophy and work from a client strengths perspective.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 174
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casa-esperanza-inc---boston.jpeg
Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valeo-behavioral-health-care.jpeg
Valeo Behavioral Health Care
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Valeo Behavioral Health Care
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Valeo Behavioral Health Care in 2026.

Incident History — Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Valeo Behavioral Health Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Valeo Behavioral Health Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casa-esperanza-inc---boston.jpeg
Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valeo-behavioral-health-care.jpeg
Valeo Behavioral Health Care
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Valeo Behavioral Health Care company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Valeo Behavioral Health Care company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) company.

In the current year, Valeo Behavioral Health Care company and Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Valeo Behavioral Health Care company nor Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Valeo Behavioral Health Care company nor Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Valeo Behavioral Health Care company nor Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) company nor Valeo Behavioral Health Care company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) nor Valeo Behavioral Health Care holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) company nor Valeo Behavioral Health Care company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Valeo Behavioral Health Care company employs more people globally than Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) nor Valeo Behavioral Health Care holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) nor Valeo Behavioral Health Care holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) nor Valeo Behavioral Health Care holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) nor Valeo Behavioral Health Care holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) nor Valeo Behavioral Health Care holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Casa Esperanza, Inc. (Boston) nor Valeo Behavioral Health Care holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N