Comparison Overview

CASA Mental Health

VS

National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences

CASA Mental Health

406 Peace Hills Tower, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3S8, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22

CASA Mental Health is a trusted non-profit organization based in Edmonton delivering holistic, culturally safe, wrap-around mental health services to approximately 4,000 children ages three to 18 and their families each year. We do this through a team of specialized mental health professionals and trauma experts committed to delivering outcomes-based programming in collaboration with community partners.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 221
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences

Marigowda Road / Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560 029, IN
Last Update:

The National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences is a multidisciplinary Institute for patient care and academic pursuit in the frontier area of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences. The Lunatic Asylum which came into being in the latter part of the 19th century was renamed as Mental Hospital in 1925 by the erstwhile Government of Mysore. This hospital and All India Institute of Mental Health established in 1954 by Government of India were amalgamated on 27th December 1974, and thus was formed the autonomous National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS). On 14th November 1994, NIMHANS was declared a Deemed University by the University Grants Commission, with academic autonomy. In the year 2012, NIMHANS was designated as an Institute of National Importance by an Act of Parliament. The priority gradient adopted at the Institute is service, manpower development and research. Multidisciplinary integrated approach is the mainstay of this institute, paving way to translate the results from bench to bedside.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 644
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casa-child-adolescent-and-family-mental-health.jpeg
CASA Mental Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-institute-of-mental-health-and-neuro-sciences.jpeg
National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CASA Mental Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CASA Mental Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences in 2026.

Incident History — CASA Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CASA Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casa-child-adolescent-and-family-mental-health.jpeg
CASA Mental Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-institute-of-mental-health-and-neuro-sciences.jpeg
National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CASA Mental Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CASA Mental Health company.

In the current year, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences company and CASA Mental Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences company nor CASA Mental Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences company nor CASA Mental Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences company nor CASA Mental Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CASA Mental Health company nor National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CASA Mental Health nor National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CASA Mental Health company nor National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences company employs more people globally than CASA Mental Health company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither CASA Mental Health nor National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CASA Mental Health nor National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CASA Mental Health nor National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CASA Mental Health nor National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CASA Mental Health nor National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CASA Mental Health nor National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N