Comparison Overview

Caruso Technologies

VS

Graffic Traffic Company

Caruso Technologies

undefined, Phoenix, AZ, 85032, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

We are the premier Global Professional Services Firm supporting the Printing and Marketing Industry with Web-to-Print and Cross-Media consulting. With a global client span ranging from Printing Companies to Marketing Services Providers to OEM Software Providers, we partner with a wide variety of end customers and provide valuable solutions to ensure their success. Whether its template building, pre-press consulting, HTML branding or cross-media campaign management, we offer multiple services that will help your company get online and grow.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Graffic Traffic Company

2275 Mcknight Rd. Suite 2, North St. Paul, Minnesota, 55109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Graffic Traffic Celebrated its 31st year in business in 2022. We are a family-owned business located in North St. Paul, MN. We specialize helping our clients "put their brand in motion" with great promotional products and decorated garments. We also support them with in-house graphic design. Graffic Traffic works with all types of organizations, schools, churches, businesses, & special events.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caruso-technologies.jpeg
Caruso Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffic-traffic-llc.jpeg
Graffic Traffic Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Caruso Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Graffic Traffic Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caruso Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graffic Traffic Company in 2025.

Incident History — Caruso Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caruso Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Graffic Traffic Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graffic Traffic Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caruso-technologies.jpeg
Caruso Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffic-traffic-llc.jpeg
Graffic Traffic Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Caruso Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Graffic Traffic Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Graffic Traffic Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Caruso Technologies company.

In the current year, Graffic Traffic Company company and Caruso Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor Caruso Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor Caruso Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor Caruso Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Caruso Technologies company nor Graffic Traffic Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Caruso Technologies nor Graffic Traffic Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Caruso Technologies company nor Graffic Traffic Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graffic Traffic Company company employs more people globally than Caruso Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Caruso Technologies nor Graffic Traffic Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Caruso Technologies nor Graffic Traffic Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Caruso Technologies nor Graffic Traffic Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Caruso Technologies nor Graffic Traffic Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Caruso Technologies nor Graffic Traffic Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Caruso Technologies nor Graffic Traffic Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N