Comparison Overview

CarStickers.com

VS

Seacourt Ltd

CarStickers.com

2146 NE 4th St, Bend, OR, 97701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

CarStickers.com was founded in 2000 making high quality products to combine the fun and appeal of shopping for stickers and decals with the high speed ease of the Internet. We've created a safe environment for you to surf and purchase our stickers and decals online through Authorize.net. Open our virtual doors and you will find one of the most comprehensive stickers and decals catalog found anywhere on the Web. Our customers have made us one of the most popular, most visited sticker and decal sites on the Internet. We consider our customers number one and your satisfaction in our first priority. We offer a large variety and some of the most unique stickers and decals available. If you don't find what you're looking for, let us know! We are always adding new products. We have created our company page to create build business relationships.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Seacourt Ltd

Pony Road, Oxford, Oxon, 0X4 2SE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Multi-award winning and market leading environmental print and communications company with official zero-waste to landfill status since Oct 2009 and winner of two Queen's Awards for Enterprise in Sustainable Development. Seacourt is renowned for its radical approach to the environment. With the acquisition of a Waterless Offset printing press nearly 15 years ago now, the company has gone from strength to strength, from being a standard dirty printer to become the first closed loop, zero waste company in its industry worldwide. Quoted as being “One of the top three leading environmental printers in the world” by a worldwide printing association, they have gone on to win the Queen’s Award for Sustainable Development twice in the period of 4 years. Clients come from a range of industry sectors, from private and public sector, NGOs, charities, small commercial organizations to big brands names, all supporting the use of ethical and environmental practices. EMAS and ISO14001 underpin the companies environmental management credendials. Seacourt is often used as an exemplar/ case study for sustainable best practice.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carstickers-com.jpeg
CarStickers.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seacourt-ltd.jpeg
Seacourt Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CarStickers.com
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seacourt Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CarStickers.com in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seacourt Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — CarStickers.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CarStickers.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seacourt Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seacourt Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carstickers-com.jpeg
CarStickers.com
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seacourt-ltd.jpeg
Seacourt Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CarStickers.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Seacourt Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Seacourt Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CarStickers.com company.

In the current year, Seacourt Ltd company and CarStickers.com company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seacourt Ltd company nor CarStickers.com company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seacourt Ltd company nor CarStickers.com company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seacourt Ltd company nor CarStickers.com company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CarStickers.com company nor Seacourt Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CarStickers.com nor Seacourt Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CarStickers.com company nor Seacourt Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Seacourt Ltd company employs more people globally than CarStickers.com company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CarStickers.com nor Seacourt Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CarStickers.com nor Seacourt Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CarStickers.com nor Seacourt Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CarStickers.com nor Seacourt Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CarStickers.com nor Seacourt Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CarStickers.com nor Seacourt Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N