Comparison Overview

Carrier HVAC

VS

Metso

Carrier HVAC

Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.carrier.com

Founded by the inventor of modern air conditioning, Carrier is a world leader in high-technology heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration solutions. Carrier experts provide sustainable solutions, integrating energy-efficient products, building controls and energy services for residential, commercial, retail, transport and food service customers. Carrier is part of Carrier Global Corporation, a leading global provider of innovative HVAC, refrigeration, and building automation technologies.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 11,168
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Metso

Rauhalanpuisto 9, Espoo, Uusimaa, 02230, FI
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.metso.com/

Metso is a frontrunner in sustainable technologies, end-to-end solutions and services for the aggregates, minerals processing and metals refining industries globally. By improving our customers’ energy and water efficiency, increasing their productivity, and reducing environmental risks with our product and process expertise, we are the partner for positive change. Metso is committed to limiting global warming to 1.5°C with Science Based Targets.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 19,117
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrierhvac.jpeg
Carrier HVAC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metso.jpeg
Metso
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carrier HVAC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metso
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carrier HVAC in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metso in 2025.

Incident History — Carrier HVAC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carrier HVAC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metso (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metso cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrierhvac.jpeg
Carrier HVAC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metso.jpeg
Metso
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Metso company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carrier HVAC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Metso company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Carrier HVAC company.

In the current year, Metso company and Carrier HVAC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metso company nor Carrier HVAC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Metso company nor Carrier HVAC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Metso company nor Carrier HVAC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Carrier HVAC company nor Metso company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Metso holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Metso company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Carrier HVAC company.

Metso company employs more people globally than Carrier HVAC company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Metso holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Metso holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Metso holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Metso holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Metso holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Metso holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References