Comparison Overview

Carrier

VS

Ambuja Cements Limited

Carrier

13995 Pasteur Blvd, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33418, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Carrier Global Corporation, global leader in intelligent climate and energy solutions, is committed to making the world safer, sustainable and more comfortable for generations to come. From the beginning, we’ve led in inventing new technologies and entirely new industries. Today, we continue to lead because we have a world-class, diverse workforce that puts the customer at the center of everything we do. For more information, visit www.Corporate.Carrier.com.

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 20,398
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ambuja Cements Limited

Elegant Business Park, Off Andheri Kurla Road,, MIDC Cross Road "B"​, Andheri (East),, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400059
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Ambuja Cements Ltd. is among the leading cement companies in India. It is a member of the Adani Group - the largest and fastest-growing portfolio of diversified sustainable businesses. Ambuja Cement is known for its hassle-free, home-building solutions. Its unique products tailor-made for Indian climatic conditions, sustainable operations and initiatives that advance the company's philosophy of contributing to the larger good of the society have made it the most trusted brand in the Indian cement industry.

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 12,028
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrier.jpeg
Carrier
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambuja-cements-ltd.jpeg
Ambuja Cements Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carrier
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ambuja Cements Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carrier in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ambuja Cements Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Carrier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carrier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ambuja Cements Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ambuja Cements Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrier.jpeg
Carrier
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambuja-cements-ltd.jpeg
Ambuja Cements Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ambuja Cements Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carrier company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ambuja Cements Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Carrier company.

In the current year, Ambuja Cements Limited company and Carrier company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ambuja Cements Limited company nor Carrier company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ambuja Cements Limited company nor Carrier company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ambuja Cements Limited company nor Carrier company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Carrier company nor Ambuja Cements Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carrier nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Carrier company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ambuja Cements Limited company.

Carrier company employs more people globally than Ambuja Cements Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale Building Materials.

Neither Carrier nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carrier nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carrier nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carrier nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carrier nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carrier nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H