Comparison Overview

Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C

VS

HCR Law Corporate

Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C

US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

Carpenter & Schumacher's representation of subrogation clients continues to grow and now represents more than 85% of the firm's practice. The attorneys specialize in the prosecution of subrogation claims involving the design and/or manufacturing of a wide variety of products. Major claim categories include: o Water Heaters o Washing machine inlet hoses o Household products o Electronic equipment o Electric beds/blankets o Automobiles o Outdoor gas grills o Air conditioners The firm also handles a wide array of other subrogation claims, including service provider negligence, roof structure failures, large water losses in commercial buildings, and negligent residential and commercial construction.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HCR Law Corporate

5 Deansway, None, Worcester, None, GB, WR1 2JG
Last Update: 2025-11-30

If you're looking for an expert legal firm that delivers results, HCR Law is the right choice. The firm has more than 800 staff across 10 locations in England and Wales. We provide legal support to both businesses and individuals in Birmingham, Cambridge, Cardiff, Cheltenham, Hereford, London, Central England, Thames Valley, Worcester, and the Wye Valley. We put our continued success down to the quality of the services we provide - it’s something on which we'll never compromise. Don't just take our word for it though - our Lexcel accreditation (the Law Society's rating for excellence) and Investors in People status acknowledges that we are dedicated to delivering excellent client care and high-quality service, whatever your legal issue.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcr-law-corporate.jpeg
HCR Law Corporate
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HCR Law Corporate
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCR Law Corporate in 2025.

Incident History — Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HCR Law Corporate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCR Law Corporate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcr-law-corporate.jpeg
HCR Law Corporate
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HCR Law Corporate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, HCR Law Corporate company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C company.

In the current year, HCR Law Corporate company and Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HCR Law Corporate company nor Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HCR Law Corporate company nor Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HCR Law Corporate company nor Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C company nor HCR Law Corporate company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C nor HCR Law Corporate holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C company nor HCR Law Corporate company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C nor HCR Law Corporate holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C nor HCR Law Corporate holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C nor HCR Law Corporate holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C nor HCR Law Corporate holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C nor HCR Law Corporate holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carpenter & Schumacher, P.C nor HCR Law Corporate holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X