Comparison Overview

Carousel Group

VS

Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana

Carousel Group

undefined, New Jersey, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Carousel Group is the operator of MaximBet, North America's first Lifestyle Sports Book & iGaming brand. We take pride in our values, designed to benefit employees, customers, partners, the community and our shareholders. We strive to provide long-term job security and exciting career paths for all of our employees and create a positive impact on the industry by respecting and nurturing regulation, responsible gaming and modern corporate social responsibilities to ultimately benefit our end-users. With teams across the world, we are a truly global and diverse company.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana

5400 W 29th Ave, Gary, 46406, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Hard Rock Casino NI offers a premier casino and entertainment destination for Northern Indiana residents and visitors. We are committed to fostering diversity, equity and inclusion. DE&I aims to address the needs of all team members – including Native Americans, women, LGBTQ+ community, people of color (BIPOC), people with disabilities and military veterans. Diversity: is the celebration of differences and leveraging those difference to produce stellar results. Equity: is a process of seeking fairness through deliberate and intentional actions. Inclusion: is when everyone has the freedom and comfort to express their thoughts, ideas, and opinions in a safe, trusting, and open environment.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 245
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hard-rock-casino-northern-indiana.jpeg
Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carousel Group
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carousel Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana in 2025.

Incident History — Carousel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carousel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carouselgroup.jpeg
Carousel Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hard-rock-casino-northern-indiana.jpeg
Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Internal Account
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Card Scraping Malware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carousel Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Carousel Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana company and Carousel Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana company nor Carousel Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Carousel Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Carousel Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Carousel Group company nor Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carousel Group nor Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Carousel Group company.

Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana company employs more people globally than Carousel Group company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Carousel Group nor Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carousel Group nor Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carousel Group nor Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carousel Group nor Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carousel Group nor Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carousel Group nor Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H