Comparison Overview

Carnegie UK

VS

Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC

Carnegie UK

Andrew Carnegie House, Dunfermline, undefined, KY12 8AW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

At Carnegie UK we’re all about wellbeing. We have been ever since we were set up over 100 years ago. Wellbeing has meant different things to different generations. Right now, the world around us is changing in ways that mean it is time to rethink how we help people to live well together. This is what ‘wellbeing’ means to us today. It is about everyone having what they need to live well now and in the future. Looking after the wellbeing of all citizens – our collective wellbeing – is a powerful way of creating a society where everyone can live well together.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC

800 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, 20006, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Rock Creek Global Advisors is an international economic policy advisory firm helping clients navigate an increasingly complex and competitive global marketplace. Our principals together bring over a century of experience operating at the highest levels of government and in the most demanding private sector environments. We know what it takes to compete globally. We can help.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carnegie-uk-trust.jpeg
Carnegie UK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rock-creek-global-advisors-llc.jpeg
Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carnegie UK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carnegie UK in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Carnegie UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carnegie UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carnegie-uk-trust.jpeg
Carnegie UK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rock-creek-global-advisors-llc.jpeg
Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Carnegie UK company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Carnegie UK company.

In the current year, Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC company and Carnegie UK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC company nor Carnegie UK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC company nor Carnegie UK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC company nor Carnegie UK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Carnegie UK company nor Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carnegie UK nor Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Carnegie UK company nor Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Carnegie UK company employs more people globally than Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Carnegie UK nor Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carnegie UK nor Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carnegie UK nor Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carnegie UK nor Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carnegie UK nor Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carnegie UK nor Rock Creek Global Advisors LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H