Comparison Overview

Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A.

VS

Prospera Law, LLP

Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A.

250 North Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL, 33765, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Attorneys in defending the accused and protecting the injured for 50+ years on thre west coast of Florida. We practice in the areas of Workers Compensation, Criminal Defense and DUI, Personal Injury, and Social Security Disability. Offices are located in Tampa, Clearwater, Bradenton, New Port Richey and Spring Hill, Florida. We have proudly served over 50,000 clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Prospera Law, LLP

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Los Angeles, California, 90067, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We at Prospera Law are committed to enabling deals and solving problems. We were founded in 2010 by lawyers, all of whom previously practiced at large international law firms, with the mission to deliver top quality sophisticated service in a highly personal boutique setting. We tackle difficult deals and issues on behalf of our clients and pride ourselves in achieving results. We close finance and M&A transactions for both public and private company clients. Our clients include the most active venture capital firm in Southern California, one of the largest utilities in the United States, and some of the largest companies in the world. Our lawyers with foreign language skills have completed cross-border transactions including those that have never been done before. In short, we are a boutique law firm with a top-notch practice.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carlson-meissner-hart-&-hayslett-p-a.jpeg
Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lkp-global-law-llp.jpeg
Prospera Law, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prospera Law, LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prospera Law, LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prospera Law, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prospera Law, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carlson-meissner-hart-&-hayslett-p-a.jpeg
Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lkp-global-law-llp.jpeg
Prospera Law, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. company and Prospera Law, LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Prospera Law, LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. company.

In the current year, Prospera Law, LLP company and Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prospera Law, LLP company nor Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prospera Law, LLP company nor Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prospera Law, LLP company nor Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. company nor Prospera Law, LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. nor Prospera Law, LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. company nor Prospera Law, LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Prospera Law, LLP company employs more people globally than Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. nor Prospera Law, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. nor Prospera Law, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. nor Prospera Law, LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. nor Prospera Law, LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. nor Prospera Law, LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carlson Meissner Hayslett P.A. nor Prospera Law, LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X