Comparison Overview

Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP

VS

SO Legal Limited

Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP

300 North 6th Street, Suite 200, Boise, ID, 83701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Perkins Mitchell is a civil litigation law firm located in Boise, Idaho. We are dedicated to representing our clients in all aspects of litigation, alternative dispute resolution and risk management. Our attorneys manage litigation in Idaho, Oregon, Utah, and Washington. Perkins Mitchell’s office is strategically placed to allow national clients to have economical, local representation over a large geographic area. Perkins Mitchell is ranked in the top 1% of law firms in the U.S. by Martindale-Hubbell and ALM Legal Leaders. We also are an "AV" Peer Review Rated law firm by Martindale-Hubbell, and a member of the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SO Legal Limited

15 Gildredge Road, Eastbourne, England, BN21 4RB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

SO Legal is a specialist law firm with offices in Brighton, Eastbourne, Hastings, London, Uckfield, and Ulverston. Our expertise includes commercial property, corporate law, litigation and dispute resolution, private client, and residential property. We are proud to assist individuals, entrepreneurs, and businesses of all sizes - from small start-ups to multinational companies - as well as organisations in the not-for-profit sector.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carey-perkins-llp.jpeg
Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SO Legal Limited
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SO Legal Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SO Legal Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SO Legal Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carey-perkins-llp.jpeg
Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/so-legal-limited.jpeg
SO Legal Limited
Incidents

FAQ

Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SO Legal Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SO Legal Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP company.

In the current year, SO Legal Limited company and Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SO Legal Limited company nor Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SO Legal Limited company nor Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SO Legal Limited company nor Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP company nor SO Legal Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP nor SO Legal Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP company nor SO Legal Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SO Legal Limited company employs more people globally than Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP nor SO Legal Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP nor SO Legal Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP nor SO Legal Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP nor SO Legal Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP nor SO Legal Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Perkins, Mitchell, Pope & McAllister LLP nor SO Legal Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X