Comparison Overview

CareTrack Health

VS

Premium Care Plastic Surgery

CareTrack Health

1109 South Park Street, Carrollton, GA, 30117, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

CareTrack’s adherence system enables primary care physicians to monitor critically and chronically ill patient care plan adherence to proactively identify and escalate earlier interventions in-between appointments. CareTrack assists practices in preventing hospitalizations, closing patient adherence gaps, improving quality measures, and driving more proactive screenings and services adoption. Since critically and chronically ill patients’ non-adherence accounts for 33% of hospitalizations nationally, the ability of medical practices to provide their patients with a tailored, systematic care plan outside of the office results in dramatically improved clinical outcomes. Patients are empowered to proactively manage conditions and assist the physician in identifying issues earlier. To learn more, please visit www.CareTrack.com.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Premium Care Plastic Surgery

Bocagrande, Cartagena, Cartagena, CO
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Patients want the best when it comes to plastic surgery, and now they have an option that offers international clinical expertise, advanced technology with accredited standards, and luxurious facilities all complemented by a warm and personalized human touch. Situated in the spectacular Caribbean setting of Cartagena, Premium Care Plastic Surgery offers its international clientele the ultimate combination of surgical expertise, world class facilities, and luxurious recovery services. Through its unique vision and innovative business model, Premium Care has set a new gold standard in plastic surgery, and treats patients from all over the world that travel to Colombia for aesthetic procedures.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caretrack-health.jpeg
CareTrack Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/premium-care-plastic-surgery.jpeg
Premium Care Plastic Surgery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CareTrack Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Premium Care Plastic Surgery
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CareTrack Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Premium Care Plastic Surgery in 2025.

Incident History — CareTrack Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CareTrack Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Premium Care Plastic Surgery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Premium Care Plastic Surgery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caretrack-health.jpeg
CareTrack Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/premium-care-plastic-surgery.jpeg
Premium Care Plastic Surgery
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CareTrack Health company and Premium Care Plastic Surgery company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Premium Care Plastic Surgery company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CareTrack Health company.

In the current year, Premium Care Plastic Surgery company and CareTrack Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Premium Care Plastic Surgery company nor CareTrack Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Premium Care Plastic Surgery company nor CareTrack Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Premium Care Plastic Surgery company nor CareTrack Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CareTrack Health company nor Premium Care Plastic Surgery company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CareTrack Health nor Premium Care Plastic Surgery holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CareTrack Health company nor Premium Care Plastic Surgery company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CareTrack Health company employs more people globally than Premium Care Plastic Surgery company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither CareTrack Health nor Premium Care Plastic Surgery holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CareTrack Health nor Premium Care Plastic Surgery holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CareTrack Health nor Premium Care Plastic Surgery holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CareTrack Health nor Premium Care Plastic Surgery holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CareTrack Health nor Premium Care Plastic Surgery holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CareTrack Health nor Premium Care Plastic Surgery holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H