Comparison Overview

Carelon Global Solutions India

VS

Zebra Technologies

Carelon Global Solutions India

Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 46204, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Carelon Global Solutions makes healthcare operations more practical, effective, and efficient. Our global team of more than 25K innovators drives growth, delivers exceptional support, and develops digital tools specifically for health plans, providers, and systems. Each day, our partners and experts from across the globe implement new ways to save time and money — so doctors can focus on care. Formerly known as Legato Health Technologies, Carelon Global Solutions is part of the Carelon family of brands and is a fully owned subsidiary of Elevance Health. Headquartered in the United States, Carelon Global Solutions has talented teams in India, Ireland, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico. Want to be part of something meaningful? Join our growing team. We believe that when bold talent meets limitless thinking, the possibilities are endless. As part of our India team, you’ll work alongside some of the best minds in the business to solve healthcare’s most complex challenges. You’ll be part of an exciting, fast-paced, and supportive company culture, where all associates receive: • Competitive pay. • Generous benefits. • Training, mentorship, and growth. • Hybrid workplace flexibility. • The opportunity to help others and make a difference. Follow our Carelon Global Solutions India LinkedIn page for the latest job postings and timely company news.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 14,598
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
3

Zebra Technologies

3 Overlook Point, Lincolnshire, IL, US, 60069
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Zebra provides the foundation for intelligent operations with an award-winning portfolio of connected frontline, asset visibility and automation solutions. Organizations globally across retail, manufacturing, transportation, logistics, healthcare, and other industries rely on us to deliver outcomes today while driving innovation for what’s next. Together with our partners, we create new ways of working that improve productivity and empower organizations to be better every day. Learn more at www.zebra.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,660
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carelon-global-solutions.jpeg
Carelon Global Solutions India
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zebra-technologies.jpeg
Zebra Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carelon Global Solutions India
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zebra Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carelon Global Solutions India in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zebra Technologies in 2026.

Incident History — Carelon Global Solutions India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carelon Global Solutions India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zebra Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zebra Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carelon-global-solutions.jpeg
Carelon Global Solutions India
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zebra-technologies.jpeg
Zebra Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zebra Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carelon Global Solutions India company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Carelon Global Solutions India company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Zebra Technologies company has not reported any.

In the current year, Zebra Technologies company and Carelon Global Solutions India company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Carelon Global Solutions India company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Zebra Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Carelon Global Solutions India company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Zebra Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Carelon Global Solutions India company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Zebra Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Carelon Global Solutions India company nor Zebra Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carelon Global Solutions India nor Zebra Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Carelon Global Solutions India company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Zebra Technologies company.

Carelon Global Solutions India company employs more people globally than Zebra Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Carelon Global Solutions India nor Zebra Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carelon Global Solutions India nor Zebra Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carelon Global Solutions India nor Zebra Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carelon Global Solutions India nor Zebra Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carelon Global Solutions India nor Zebra Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carelon Global Solutions India nor Zebra Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N