Comparison Overview

CareLink Community Support Services

VS

Projekt 42

CareLink Community Support Services

605 E. Baltimore Pike, Media, PA, 19063, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Since 1959, CareLink has provided individuals living with severe and persistent mental illness unique programs and support to help them achieve wellness, recovery, and self-determination. CareLink’s philosophy is that people with disabilities can live, work, and participate in their community with independence if they have caring support and help learning essential skills. CareLink offers welcoming housing, career and education services, community outreach, and case management for adults in Southeastern PA and NJ. For more information on how you can help support CareLink please visit our website at www.carelinkservices.org.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 146
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Projekt 42

117 Leith Walk, Edinburgh, East Lothian, EH6 8NP, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Projekt 42 is the UK’s first wellness centre to combine personal training, group fitness, yoga and mental health services – all in one membership subscription. We aim to help communities see and understand the connection between physical fitness and mental health and the need to take care of both. We make a booking to see a Person-Centred Counsellor, Cognitive Behavioural Therapist or Psychotherapist as easy as booking a fitness class. We are different to most commercial gyms. We have no shareholders, and we employ a circular revenue system where up to 40% of the membership fee that people pay to access our services goes towards paying for community members to access free and part-funded counselling, free monthly memberships and community programs. We opened in 2017 with four volunteers and now have a team of over 100 people working together to help as many of our community members access fitness, yoga and mental health services.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/projekt-42.jpeg
Projekt 42
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CareLink Community Support Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Projekt 42
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CareLink Community Support Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Projekt 42 in 2026.

Incident History — CareLink Community Support Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CareLink Community Support Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Projekt 42 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Projekt 42 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carelink-community-support-services.jpeg
CareLink Community Support Services
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/projekt-42.jpeg
Projekt 42
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CareLink Community Support Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Projekt 42 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Projekt 42 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CareLink Community Support Services company.

In the current year, Projekt 42 company and CareLink Community Support Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Projekt 42 company nor CareLink Community Support Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Projekt 42 company nor CareLink Community Support Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Projekt 42 company nor CareLink Community Support Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services company nor Projekt 42 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services nor Projekt 42 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services company nor Projekt 42 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CareLink Community Support Services company employs more people globally than Projekt 42 company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services nor Projekt 42 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services nor Projekt 42 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services nor Projekt 42 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services nor Projekt 42 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services nor Projekt 42 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services nor Projekt 42 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.