Comparison Overview

Cardozo Law Review

VS

Knit Wit Magazine

Cardozo Law Review

55 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10003, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

The Cardozo Law Review was established in 1979, and is currently publishing its forty-sixth volume. It publishes six issues per year, which contain articles and student notes on a variety of legal topics. The Law Review is dedicated to advancing empirical, interdisciplinary, and philosophical scholarship, as well as exploring cutting-edge national issues. It consistently ranks among the top law journals in the country. The Law Review sponsors several symposia and lectures each year that delve into unique and intellectually stimulating areas of legal scholarship. De•novo, Cardozo Law Review’s online journal, publishes shorter works of legal scholarship written by legal scholars, professors, judges, and practitioners, including Articles on timely legal issues, as well as responses to Articles that appear in the print journal. In addition, de·novo publishes several student Notes each year. De·novo hosts “online-symposia” that feature pieces of legal scholarship centered around selected legal issues in order to foster a timely and topical debate.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 93
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Knit Wit Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Revolutionizing craft media, one paper page at a time. Knit Wit is a biannual print-only lifestyle publication focused on fiber art and crafts. We tell the stories of the people and companies that are changing the face of this dynamic community—with none of the hokey stuff. Join us online via social media or IRL at a mailbox near you.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cardozo-law-review.jpeg
Cardozo Law Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knit-wit-magazine.jpeg
Knit Wit Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cardozo Law Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Knit Wit Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cardozo Law Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knit Wit Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Cardozo Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cardozo Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Knit Wit Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knit Wit Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cardozo-law-review.jpeg
Cardozo Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knit-wit-magazine.jpeg
Knit Wit Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Knit Wit Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cardozo Law Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Knit Wit Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cardozo Law Review company.

In the current year, Knit Wit Magazine company and Cardozo Law Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Knit Wit Magazine company nor Cardozo Law Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Knit Wit Magazine company nor Cardozo Law Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Knit Wit Magazine company nor Cardozo Law Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cardozo Law Review company nor Knit Wit Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cardozo Law Review nor Knit Wit Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cardozo Law Review company nor Knit Wit Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Cardozo Law Review nor Knit Wit Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cardozo Law Review nor Knit Wit Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cardozo Law Review nor Knit Wit Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cardozo Law Review nor Knit Wit Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cardozo Law Review nor Knit Wit Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cardozo Law Review nor Knit Wit Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.