Comparison Overview

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

VS

Selborne Chambers

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

55 Fifth Avenue, New York, 10003, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) is the country’s preeminent legal journal of arbitration, negotiation, mediation, settlement, and restorative justice. We are one of the most heavily-cited legal publications in the field of “Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution,” ranked as seventh in the United States in this broad category. The Journal is affiliated with Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School’s Kukin Program for Conflict Resolution, which is itself ranked as the sixth best dispute resolution program in the country. Edited by third-year law students and staffed by second-year law students, the Journal publishes on issues at the cutting edge of legal and academic thought. We publish three issues annually: Fall, Winter, and Spring. In addition, the Journal hosts an annual Symposium on an important and timely topic in dispute resolution. Our symposia bring together top national and international scholars, practitioners, and policymakers. We also host other events throughout the year, offering Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credit for attendance. Each year, the Journal presents the International Advocate for Peace (IAP) Award to an individual who is exemplary in the field of global conflict resolution. Past recipients have included pathbreaking figures such as President Bill Clinton, diplomat Richard Holbrooke, Archbishop Desmond M. Tutu, economist Jeffrey Sachs, and filmmaker Abigail Disney. The presentation of the IAP Award is always one of the most anticipated moments of the academic year at Cardozo and for New York’s broader dispute resolution community. If you are interested in submitting an article to the Journal, please send your CV, cover letter, and manuscript to [email protected].

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Selborne Chambers

Selborne Chambers, London, WC2R 3AA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Selborne Chambers is a vibrant and successful commercial chancery barristers'​ chambers. We are noted especially for the commercial and practical approach we adopt in the resolution of disputes and the quality and clarity of advice that we deliver in an efficient and approachable manner. Our approach has been recognised by the legal directories and reflected in frequent praise of members across a number of practice areas. This breadth of ability in chambers allows members with expertise in complementary fields to work together in teams to deliver the appropriate skills to service clients'​ needs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cardozo-journal-of-conflict-resolution.jpeg
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/selborne-chambers-london.jpeg
Selborne Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Selborne Chambers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Selborne Chambers in 2025.

Incident History — Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Selborne Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Selborne Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cardozo-journal-of-conflict-resolution.jpeg
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/selborne-chambers-london.jpeg
Selborne Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution company and Selborne Chambers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Selborne Chambers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution company.

In the current year, Selborne Chambers company and Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Selborne Chambers company nor Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Selborne Chambers company nor Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Selborne Chambers company nor Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution company nor Selborne Chambers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution nor Selborne Chambers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution company nor Selborne Chambers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Selborne Chambers company employs more people globally than Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution nor Selborne Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution nor Selborne Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution nor Selborne Chambers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution nor Selborne Chambers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution nor Selborne Chambers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution nor Selborne Chambers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X