Comparison Overview

Card USA, Inc.

VS

Note Printing Australia

Card USA, Inc.

201 N Ocean Dr, Hollywood, Florida, US, 33019
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Card USA Inc. is a card production management company and has been ranked as a top card manufacturer of cards by Nilson Report and listed as one of the 500 fastest growing companies in the US by INC. Magazine. Card USA’s business has steadily expanded and specialized in the Smart Card, EMV, SIM / USIM Cards, Prepaid Cards, Retail Gift & Prepaid card packaging, Government cards, and Bank Card markets. Our mission at CardUSA is to provide our clients with exceptional service in all areas of the production process. At the core of our mission, is the ability to reduce the cost of our products and services without sacrificing their quality and value. CardUSA is strongly committed to establishing and maintaining the relationship between our company and our customers. We also value our people as the only assets that appreciate. We are continually striving to create the best possible solutions for you to ensure that CardUSA continues to remain a leader in card manufacturing, personalization and fulfillment.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Note Printing Australia

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Note Printing Australia is a high security printer that cares deeply about the well-being of the people and nations that use our banknotes and passports. As a 100% subsidiary of the Reserve Bank of Australia, we have built our policies and normal business processes around exacting G20 Government standards that enable us to deliver banknotes and passports on-time, on-budget, and to the highest quality.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 189
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/card-usa-inc-.jpeg
Card USA, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/note-printing-australia.jpeg
Note Printing Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Card USA, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Note Printing Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Card USA, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Note Printing Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Card USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Card USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Note Printing Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Note Printing Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/card-usa-inc-.jpeg
Card USA, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/note-printing-australia.jpeg
Note Printing Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Note Printing Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Card USA, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Note Printing Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Card USA, Inc. company.

In the current year, Note Printing Australia company and Card USA, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Note Printing Australia company nor Card USA, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Note Printing Australia company nor Card USA, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Note Printing Australia company nor Card USA, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Card USA, Inc. company nor Note Printing Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Card USA, Inc. nor Note Printing Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Card USA, Inc. company nor Note Printing Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Note Printing Australia company employs more people globally than Card USA, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Card USA, Inc. nor Note Printing Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Card USA, Inc. nor Note Printing Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Card USA, Inc. nor Note Printing Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Card USA, Inc. nor Note Printing Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Card USA, Inc. nor Note Printing Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Card USA, Inc. nor Note Printing Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L