Comparison Overview

Capturelab

VS

Five to Sixty

Capturelab

61 Marlborough St, Surry Hills, 2010, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2005, Capturelab is a leading post production house servicing all aspects of content creation. We've been trusted by some of Australia's most respected brands, including Vogue, David Jones, Berlei, Jurlique and The Australian Ballet. Our work Specialising in the advertising, retail and beauty industries, we draw upon a broad in-house talent base to provide services that include retouching, 3D modelling and animation, motion graphics design, title design, film editing, colour grading, on set digital technical and data wrangling, layout and graphic design and certified colour proofing. Our method A single social post. A hero billboard. A hybrid 3D animation and real-time footage composite. An entire suite of visual assets for an omni-channel campaign. We cover it all. ​ We collaborate with creatives, agencies and brands to bring ideas to life. By listening to and understanding what they need, our crafts become an ongoing, invaluable part of their business, and we effectively become an extension of their team.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Five to Sixty

215 Park Ave S, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Five to Sixty is a creative production agency driven to create the snackable, shareable five to sixty second content that today’s internet audience hungers for. Whether a 5 second Instagram video, 15 second TikTok ad or full blown 60 second broadcast spot, we have the talent and capability to do it all. We are millennials and generation z making videos for our peers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capturelab.jpeg
Capturelab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/five-to-sixty.jpeg
Five to Sixty
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Capturelab
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Five to Sixty
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capturelab in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Five to Sixty in 2025.

Incident History — Capturelab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capturelab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Five to Sixty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Five to Sixty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capturelab.jpeg
Capturelab
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/five-to-sixty.jpeg
Five to Sixty
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Capturelab company and Five to Sixty company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Five to Sixty company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Capturelab company.

In the current year, Five to Sixty company and Capturelab company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Five to Sixty company nor Capturelab company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Five to Sixty company nor Capturelab company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Five to Sixty company nor Capturelab company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Capturelab company nor Five to Sixty company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Capturelab nor Five to Sixty holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Capturelab company nor Five to Sixty company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Five to Sixty company employs more people globally than Capturelab company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither Capturelab nor Five to Sixty holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Capturelab nor Five to Sixty holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Capturelab nor Five to Sixty holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Capturelab nor Five to Sixty holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Capturelab nor Five to Sixty holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Capturelab nor Five to Sixty holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N