Comparison Overview

Capture Property Marketing AUS

VS

4th Wall Photography

Capture Property Marketing AUS

294 Blackburn Rd, Doncaster East, Victoria, 3109, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-15
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.captureproperty.com.au

Capture Property Marketing consists of a passionate and energetic team of creatives based in Doncaster East specialising in high quality marketing solutions for businesses all over Melbourne. Our enthusiasm, professionalism and unwavering commitment to our clients will be evident from the first time you meet with our highly skilled team of professionals. Encompassing all aspects of real estate marketing, our services include; Photography Videography Floorplanning Copywriting Virtual Staging Virtual Tours Disrupting what is currently available on the market, we have created and mastered products exclusively executed for our clients which result in unique listings and higher engagement rate. Using state of the art equipment, we work with you to to identify, style and capture every property’s unique selling points. By creating extraordinary images and a powerful first impression we are dedicated to helping you make your property stand out.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

4th Wall Photography

Echo Park Los Angeles, CA, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.4thwallphotography.com

I left the corporate world or shall I say it left me in 2001. I decided to pursue my dream of becoming an actor while I freelanced as a website designer. Several years ago, I stepped behind the lens bringing my knowledge and experience with theatre, and I have been in the pursuit of capturing, through the lens, those fleeting moments with people ever since. I am based in Los Angeles, CA.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capture-property-marketing-aus.jpeg
Capture Property Marketing AUS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4th-wall-photography.jpeg
4th Wall Photography
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Capture Property Marketing AUS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
4th Wall Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capture Property Marketing AUS in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 4th Wall Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Capture Property Marketing AUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capture Property Marketing AUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 4th Wall Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

4th Wall Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capture-property-marketing-aus.jpeg
Capture Property Marketing AUS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4th-wall-photography.jpeg
4th Wall Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

4th Wall Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capture Property Marketing AUS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 4th Wall Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Capture Property Marketing AUS company.

In the current year, 4th Wall Photography company and Capture Property Marketing AUS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 4th Wall Photography company nor Capture Property Marketing AUS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 4th Wall Photography company nor Capture Property Marketing AUS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 4th Wall Photography company nor Capture Property Marketing AUS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Capture Property Marketing AUS company nor 4th Wall Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Capture Property Marketing AUS nor 4th Wall Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Capture Property Marketing AUS company nor 4th Wall Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Capture Property Marketing AUS company employs more people globally than 4th Wall Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Capture Property Marketing AUS nor 4th Wall Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Capture Property Marketing AUS nor 4th Wall Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Capture Property Marketing AUS nor 4th Wall Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Capture Property Marketing AUS nor 4th Wall Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Capture Property Marketing AUS nor 4th Wall Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Capture Property Marketing AUS nor 4th Wall Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References