Comparison Overview

California Policy Lab

VS

SEPI

California Policy Lab

337 Charles E Young Dr E, Los Angeles, California, 90095, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

The California Policy Lab is an institute at the University of California that generates research insights for government impact. Through hands-on partnerships with government agencies, CPL performs rigorous research across issue silos and builds the data infrastructure necessary to improve programs and policies that millions of Californians rely on every day.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SEPI

c/ Velázquez, 134, Madrid, Madrid, 28006, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

La Sociedad Estatal de Participaciones Industriales (SEPI) desarrolla su actividad a través de tres grandes líneas de trabajo: - Como primer holding público empresarial de España impulsa el desarrollo y crecimiento de sus empresas, con el doble objetivo de lograr su rentabilidad económica y social. SEPI es accionista mayoritario de 14 empresas y cuenta con participación directa minoritaria en otras 10. Además, todas estas sociedades a su vez participan en más de 100 empresas. - Contribuye a la definición de la estrategia industrial del país con su actividad en sectores de especial relevancia como el servicio postal, el sector agroalimentario, la logística y la distribución, la construcción naval, la defensa nacional, el sector de la comunicación, el sector energético, el desarrollo empresarial, el sector financiero y, también, en el ocio y el deporte. Con una plantilla de más de 85.000 personas, el Grupo SEPI está presente en todas las comunidades autónomas y en la totalidad de las provincias de nuestro país. - A través del Fondo de Apoyo a la Solvencia de Empresas Estratégicas fomenta la recuperación del tejido empresarial tras la pandemia. Cuenta con una fundación pública, FUNDACIÓN SEPI, que promueve programas de becas de formación práctica para jóvenes titulados sin experiencia laboral, y realiza actividades de formación, además de estudios y publicaciones de carácter económico. SEPI nace el 16 de junio de 1995, con el Instituto Nacional de Industria (INI) como antecedente. Actualmente, depende del Ministerio de Hacienda.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 369
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capolicylab.jpeg
California Policy Lab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sepi.jpeg
SEPI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
California Policy Lab
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SEPI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Policy Lab in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SEPI in 2025.

Incident History — California Policy Lab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Policy Lab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SEPI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEPI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capolicylab.jpeg
California Policy Lab
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sepi.jpeg
SEPI
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SEPI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to California Policy Lab company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SEPI company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to California Policy Lab company.

In the current year, SEPI company and California Policy Lab company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SEPI company nor California Policy Lab company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SEPI company nor California Policy Lab company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SEPI company nor California Policy Lab company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither California Policy Lab company nor SEPI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither California Policy Lab nor SEPI holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither California Policy Lab company nor SEPI company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SEPI company employs more people globally than California Policy Lab company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither California Policy Lab nor SEPI holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither California Policy Lab nor SEPI holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither California Policy Lab nor SEPI holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither California Policy Lab nor SEPI holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither California Policy Lab nor SEPI holds HIPAA certification.

Neither California Policy Lab nor SEPI holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H