Comparison Overview

Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc.

VS

SA Labour Guide

Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc.

2401 Bristol Court SW, Olympia, Washington, 9850, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are the Pacific Northwest’s number one choice for remote, in-person and hybrid depositions and hearings! Since 1978 Capitol Pacific Reporting has been providing excellent and reliable court reporting services to the legal community. We are fiercely committed to facilitating the success of your deposition or hearing, from scheduling through the final delivery of your transcript. We understand that your success depends, in part, upon up-to-the-minute litigation support from your court reporting team. That is why our reporters continuously upgrade their skills by attending continuing education classes and by independently educating themselves about cutting-edge technology. We also understand that our scheduling desk must be manned personally during business hours to accommodate last minute and emergency scheduling. That is why our deposition coordinator is on duty from 8:00 to 5:00 every weekday, and why we provide “after hours” numbers where we can be reached at any time. Free deposition suites are provided for your use in our four office locations (Tacoma, Olympia, Aberdeen and Centralia). Our scheduling coordinator will personally schedule your deposition, arrange for a conference room, help arrange for local accommodations, help you locate a process server or interpreter, and do whatever is needed to make your deposition a success. And if you have a need that we can’t fulfill, we’ll find someone who can.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SA Labour Guide

54 Islington Crescent, Midrand, 1692, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Labour Guide is a professional labour relations and health and safety consultancy specialising in providing services of: • independent; • highly qualified; • experienced South African Labour and health and safety professionals since 2001. Labour Guide is an accredited service provider registered with the SERVICES SETA (Accreditation no 3821) and has as a Memorandum of Understanding with the SABPP (Accreditation number 61112L025LG) and the ETDP Seta. Labour Guide is a professional labour relations consultancy , specializing in providing advice in terms of labour relations support and advice , human resource management, employment equity and many other facets of the South African labour relations scenario. Labour Guide seeks to offer a combination of products coupled with impeccable, professional service. Training Workshops/ Courses Labour Guide provides professional training on contemporary labour relations and health and safety. Representation and/or assistance of clients at Arbitration at the CCMA, Bargaining Council and or private Arbitration hearings. Professional representation at the labour court HR Manual: Preparation of Policies These policies have to be updated on a regular basis. The subscription for the SA Labour Manual is 12 months, whereby the client receive free updates and additional information including amendments on labour legislation for a period of 12 months. Legal Assistance Help Line

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capitol-pacific-reporting-inc-.jpeg
Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-labour-guide.jpeg
SA Labour Guide
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SA Labour Guide
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SA Labour Guide in 2025.

Incident History — Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SA Labour Guide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SA Labour Guide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capitol-pacific-reporting-inc-.jpeg
Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-labour-guide.jpeg
SA Labour Guide
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SA Labour Guide company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SA Labour Guide company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. company.

In the current year, SA Labour Guide company and Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SA Labour Guide company nor Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SA Labour Guide company nor Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SA Labour Guide company nor Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. company nor SA Labour Guide company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. nor SA Labour Guide holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. company nor SA Labour Guide company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SA Labour Guide company employs more people globally than Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. nor SA Labour Guide holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. nor SA Labour Guide holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. nor SA Labour Guide holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. nor SA Labour Guide holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. nor SA Labour Guide holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Capitol Pacific Reporting, Inc. nor SA Labour Guide holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X