Comparison Overview

Capital Brief

VS

Defense One

Capital Brief

Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.capitalbrief.com/

Capital Brief is the source of intelligence for the people building and shaping the future of Australia. We produce original journalism that provides value: We break stories down - we don’t beat them up. We help our audience understand the changing nature of their world and enable them to make informed decisions. We inform the people powering the new Australian economy: Founders and executives who need capital to grow their businesses, the people who help them get it, investors who allocate it, and decision makers in the national capital, Canberra. We are interested in people who build things: Those who have dedicated their lives to solving big and difficult problems through entrepreneurship, business leadership or policy. We are politically independent and believe in the power of business: For a free-market economy to properly function it requires the media to scrutinise the business world and hold power to account.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Defense One

The Watergate, Washington, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
https://www.defenseone.com/

Defense One delivers news, breaking analysis, and ideas on the topics and trends defining a new era in U.S. defense and national security. We publish news and commentary and hold live and virtual events. Defense One is part of GovExec, an information company that helps contractors and government leaders support each other.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capitalbrief.jpeg
Capital Brief
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defense-one.jpeg
Defense One
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Capital Brief
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Defense One
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capital Brief in 2026.

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Defense One in 2026.

Incident History — Capital Brief (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital Brief cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Defense One (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Defense One cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capitalbrief.jpeg
Capital Brief
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defense-one.jpeg
Defense One
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Defense One company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capital Brief company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Capital Brief company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Defense One company has not reported any.

In the current year, Defense One company and Capital Brief company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Defense One company nor Capital Brief company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Defense One company nor Capital Brief company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Capital Brief company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Defense One company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Capital Brief company nor Defense One company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Capital Brief nor Defense One holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Capital Brief company nor Defense One company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Capital Brief company employs more people globally than Defense One company, reflecting its scale as a Internet News.

Neither Capital Brief nor Defense One holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Capital Brief nor Defense One holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Capital Brief nor Defense One holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Capital Brief nor Defense One holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Capital Brief nor Defense One holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Capital Brief nor Defense One holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References