Comparison Overview

Capital Printing Corporation

VS

Central Printing

Capital Printing Corporation

420 South Ave, Middlesex, NJ 08846, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.capitalprintingcorp.com

Capital Printing is a full service commercial printer centrally located in Middlesex, NJ. We pride ourselves on our extensive production capabilities, our commitment to quality and to our extremely competitive pricing structure. Our equipment list, which can be found online (www.capitalprintingcorp.com) includes a state of the art prep department, a robust and flexible press room, and full service bindery complete with die-cutting and inline finishing capabilities. In addition to the capabilities highlighted in the equipment list, we have also earned several very prestigious certifications that reflect our commitment to quality, our employees and to the environment. Below is a list of those certifications: • Women Business Enterprise (WBE) • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) o ISO 9001: 2000 • Forrest Stewardship Council (FSC) • Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) • Community Energy Corporation • G7 Certified • Union Shop

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Central Printing

735 Sugar Creek Road, Delavan, 53115, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.centralprinting.com

Central Printing & Media Solutions is an industry leader with over forty years of creative design services, digital printing, offset printing finishing and mailing services. Our customers are located in Southeastern Wisconsin, Northern Illinois, and across the United States. We provide clients with prompt, cost-effective service and superior quality products. We invite you to join our impressive list of clientele who rely on us for their diverse printing and design requirements.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-printing-corporation.jpeg
Capital Printing Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-printing.jpeg
Central Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Capital Printing Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Central Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capital Printing Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Capital Printing Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital Printing Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Central Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Central Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-printing-corporation.jpeg
Capital Printing Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-printing.jpeg
Central Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Central Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capital Printing Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Central Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Capital Printing Corporation company.

In the current year, Central Printing company and Capital Printing Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Central Printing company nor Capital Printing Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Central Printing company nor Capital Printing Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Central Printing company nor Capital Printing Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation company nor Central Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation nor Central Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation company nor Central Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Central Printing company employs more people globally than Capital Printing Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation nor Central Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation nor Central Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation nor Central Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation nor Central Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation nor Central Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation nor Central Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References