Comparison Overview

Capital Group

VS

SM Investments

Capital Group

333 South Hope Street, None, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90071
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Capital Group was established in 1931 in Los Angeles, California, and now has 31 offices around the globe. For over 90 years we've provided carefully researched investment solutions and services to financial professionals. *** We've been made aware of an employment scam fraudulently using Capital Group's name. Please note: Capital Group currently does not offer 100% remote work positions. On average, the interview process can take one to three months to go from resume submission to offer. Financial transactions are never part of the job on boarding process. For your own cyber safety and security, if you suspect fraud, please do not respond to or interact with messages claiming to be from Capital Group. You can also contact [email protected] to verify a job opportunity.*** This content is published by Capital Group, home of American Funds Distributors, Inc. which will be renamed Capital Client Group, Inc. on or around July 1, 2024. For important legal information please click the company details website link: https://www.capitalgroup.com/us/landing-pages/linkedin-terms-of-use.html

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,374
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SM Investments

Harbor Drive, Mall of Asia Complex 10th Floor Pasay City, Metro Manila 1900, PH
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

SM Investments Corporation is a leading Philippine company that is invested in market-leading businesses in retail, banking, and property. It also invests in ventures that capture high growth opportunities in the emerging Philippine economy. SM’s retail operations are the country’s largest and most diversified with its food, non-food, and specialty retail stores. SM’s property arm, SM Prime Holdings, Inc., is the largest integrated property developer in the Philippines with interests in malls, residences, offices, hotels, and convention centers as well as tourism-related property developments. SM’s interests in banking are in BDO Unibank, Inc., the country’s largest bank, and China Banking Corporation, the fourth largest bank by total assets among private banks. SM’s retail operations are the country’s largest and most diversified with its food, non-food and specialty retail stores. SM’s property arm, SM Prime Holdings, Inc., is the largest integrated property developer in the Philippines with interests in malls, residences, offices, hotels and convention centers as well as tourism-related property developments. SM’s interests in banking are in BDO Unibank, Inc., the country’s largest bank and China Banking Corporation, the 6th largest bank.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-group.jpeg
Capital Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sm-investments-corporation.jpeg
SM Investments
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Capital Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SM Investments
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capital Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SM Investments in 2025.

Incident History — Capital Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SM Investments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SM Investments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-group.jpeg
Capital Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sm-investments-corporation.jpeg
SM Investments
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SM Investments company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capital Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SM Investments company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Capital Group company.

In the current year, SM Investments company and Capital Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SM Investments company nor Capital Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SM Investments company nor Capital Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SM Investments company nor Capital Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Capital Group company nor SM Investments company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Capital Group nor SM Investments holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Capital Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SM Investments company.

Capital Group company employs more people globally than SM Investments company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Capital Group nor SM Investments holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Capital Group nor SM Investments holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Capital Group nor SM Investments holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Capital Group nor SM Investments holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Capital Group nor SM Investments holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Capital Group nor SM Investments holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N