Comparison Overview

Capital Area Counseling Service

VS

Lighthouse Recovery Institute

Capital Area Counseling Service

803 E. Dakota Avenue, Pierre, South Dakota, 57501, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

CACS has been providing services since 1968. We are accredited by the State of South Dakota as a mental health, addiction treatment and child welfare agency. Our mission is to serve our clients with compassion and respect. All of our clinical staff is certified, licensed or are in the process of completing their professional credentials. Less experienced staff receive guidance regularly from their clinical supervisor. Charitable gifts to the CACS Endowment are very appreciated and can be sent directly to the Oahe Foundation at BankWest, 420 S. Pierre St., Pierre, SD 57501. With compassion and respect CACS provides addiction, behavioral and mental health programs and services for communities, families and individuals in central South Dakota.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lighthouse Recovery Institute

1609 S Congress Ave, Boynton Beach, FL, 33426, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

At Lighthouse Recovery Institute, our mission is to help our patients attain peace of mind, happiness, and permanent recovery. Our clinical staff boasts over 30 years experience in substance abuse, eating disorder, and trauma treatment. Our passionate team of doctors, therapists, and addiction specialists provide the highest quality care for everyone who walks through our doors. All counseling, groups, and recovery resources occur in a small and intimate clinical environment. This fosters growth and emotional development. Lighthouse Recovery Institute is, simply put, redefining how drug and alcohol treatment centers operate. We’ve built a holistic and comprehensive clinical modality, which is then customized to each individual patient. At Lighthouse Recovery Institute, we believe in personalizing all of our services.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-area-counseling-service.jpeg
Capital Area Counseling Service
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lighthouse-recovery-institute.jpeg
Lighthouse Recovery Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Capital Area Counseling Service
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lighthouse Recovery Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capital Area Counseling Service in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lighthouse Recovery Institute in 2026.

Incident History — Capital Area Counseling Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital Area Counseling Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lighthouse Recovery Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lighthouse Recovery Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-area-counseling-service.jpeg
Capital Area Counseling Service
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lighthouse-recovery-institute.jpeg
Lighthouse Recovery Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Capital Area Counseling Service company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lighthouse Recovery Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lighthouse Recovery Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Capital Area Counseling Service company.

In the current year, Lighthouse Recovery Institute company and Capital Area Counseling Service company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lighthouse Recovery Institute company nor Capital Area Counseling Service company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lighthouse Recovery Institute company nor Capital Area Counseling Service company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lighthouse Recovery Institute company nor Capital Area Counseling Service company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Capital Area Counseling Service company nor Lighthouse Recovery Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Capital Area Counseling Service nor Lighthouse Recovery Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Capital Area Counseling Service company nor Lighthouse Recovery Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Capital Area Counseling Service company employs more people globally than Lighthouse Recovery Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Capital Area Counseling Service nor Lighthouse Recovery Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Capital Area Counseling Service nor Lighthouse Recovery Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Capital Area Counseling Service nor Lighthouse Recovery Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Capital Area Counseling Service nor Lighthouse Recovery Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Capital Area Counseling Service nor Lighthouse Recovery Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Capital Area Counseling Service nor Lighthouse Recovery Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N