Comparison Overview

CAPEHART Photography

VS

Carmel Cottingham Productions

CAPEHART Photography

234 S County Rd, Palm Beach, Florida, 33480, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15

The Capehart team has offered the highest level of professional service and creative photography to Palm Beach and throughout South Florida for over 40 years. Photographic Services include galas, events, weddings, family portraits, business portraits, fine art documentation. Photography Concierge includes cataloging, corrective retouching, restoration, curating and graphic design services for specialty photographic items. Our photographers Julia Duresky, Kim Zucarro, Chris Salata, Jamie Philips, Jamie Maness and Carrie look forward to working with you. Please contact us anytime! 561-833-7507 or [email protected]

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Carmel Cottingham Productions

None
Last Update: 2025-12-16
Between 750 and 799

A production company without boundaries. No shoot is too small or too large. If you need a two man crew (you and me) or require helicopters and rare monkeys, I will ensure your shoot or project meets all expectations. This is a job of making the impossible, possible, quickly. I will work to negotiate budgets and create a seamless shoot for the best price possible and ALWAYS within budget. As a producer, it's vital to preempt ANY and ALL of the necessary details and potential roadblocks for every project. Prevent and plan for everything. Then while on set, the priority can be kept to the important things; making a great product and maximizing on our fun potential. Keep the shoot light and stress free, while working efficiently and getting the job done in a timely way and ALWAYS within budget. If you're in need of production help, on any scale. Give me a call. I enjoy making connections with anyone in the industry and am eager to build a strong presence in the bay area.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capehart-photography.jpeg
CAPEHART Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Carmel Cottingham Productions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CAPEHART Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Carmel Cottingham Productions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CAPEHART Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carmel Cottingham Productions in 2025.

Incident History — CAPEHART Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CAPEHART Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Carmel Cottingham Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carmel Cottingham Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capehart-photography.jpeg
CAPEHART Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Carmel Cottingham Productions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Carmel Cottingham Productions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CAPEHART Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Carmel Cottingham Productions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CAPEHART Photography company.

In the current year, Carmel Cottingham Productions company and CAPEHART Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Carmel Cottingham Productions company nor CAPEHART Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Carmel Cottingham Productions company nor CAPEHART Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Carmel Cottingham Productions company nor CAPEHART Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CAPEHART Photography company nor Carmel Cottingham Productions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CAPEHART Photography nor Carmel Cottingham Productions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CAPEHART Photography company nor Carmel Cottingham Productions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither CAPEHART Photography nor Carmel Cottingham Productions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CAPEHART Photography nor Carmel Cottingham Productions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CAPEHART Photography nor Carmel Cottingham Productions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CAPEHART Photography nor Carmel Cottingham Productions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CAPEHART Photography nor Carmel Cottingham Productions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CAPEHART Photography nor Carmel Cottingham Productions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N