Comparison Overview

Cap Sciences

VS

Historic Royal Palaces

Cap Sciences

Esplanade du Professeur Tournesol, Bordeaux, 33300, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Au cœur de la métropole bordelaise, Cap Sciences offre au public un lieu pour explorer les sciences et les techniques : expositions, animations, manifestations. En Aquitaine et au-delà, Cap Sciences propose un catalogue d'expositions itinérantes, d'ateliers découverte, de mallettes pédagogiques et d'animations ludiques. Concevoir et réaliser des productions et des manifestations culturelles, accompagner des projets éducatifs, accueillir et animer, éditer et diffuser, autant de savoir-faire que Cap Sciences met au service de ses partenaires. Cap Sciences est situé sur les quais de Bordeaux, au bord du fleuve dans un bâtiment moderne conçu pour accueillir les visiteurs et organiser des événements et séminaires.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Historic Royal Palaces

East Molesey, Surrey, GB, KT8 9AU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

We are the charity who love and look after Hampton Court Palace, Kensington Palace, Tower of London, the Banqueting House, Kew Palace, and Hillsborough Castle and Gardens. The palaces are the setting for the stories that shape us all, and we’re bringing them to people in ways that mean more to them. We want everyone to find themselves in the spaces and stories we share. The palaces are owned by The King on behalf of the nation. As an independent charity, we raise all our own funds and depend on the support of our visitors, members, donors, sponsors and volunteers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 936
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cap-sciences.jpeg
Cap Sciences
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-royal-palaces.jpeg
Historic Royal Palaces
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cap Sciences
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historic Royal Palaces
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cap Sciences in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Royal Palaces in 2026.

Incident History — Cap Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cap Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historic Royal Palaces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Royal Palaces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cap-sciences.jpeg
Cap Sciences
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-royal-palaces.jpeg
Historic Royal Palaces
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historic Royal Palaces company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cap Sciences company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historic Royal Palaces company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cap Sciences company.

In the current year, Historic Royal Palaces company and Cap Sciences company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historic Royal Palaces company nor Cap Sciences company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historic Royal Palaces company nor Cap Sciences company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historic Royal Palaces company nor Cap Sciences company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cap Sciences company nor Historic Royal Palaces company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Historic Royal Palaces holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cap Sciences company nor Historic Royal Palaces company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic Royal Palaces company employs more people globally than Cap Sciences company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Historic Royal Palaces holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Historic Royal Palaces holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Historic Royal Palaces holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Historic Royal Palaces holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Historic Royal Palaces holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Historic Royal Palaces holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.